Kalana Ispat (KALANA)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹24.5
Market Cap₹25.56 Cr
P/E Ratio50.12
ROCE6.98%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-98.59%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-9.96%
Promoter Holding62.91%
52-Week Range₹17.7 — ₹30.75
SectorIndustrial Products

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹24.50, Kalana Ispat has a market capitalisation of just ₹26 crore. Small steel companies rarely possess durable moats, and the numbers confirm my caution. Latest quarter sales were ₹25 crore, but net profit was ₹0 crore. Profit growth has fallen by 98.59%, and sales are down 9.96%. This is a cyclical business in a down phase, not a growing franchise. ROCE is only 6.98%, which likely gives little return over the cost of capital. A P/E of 50.12 on collapsed earnings tells me the E is unreliable; Graham would discard such an earnings-based multiple. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 reinforces weak financial health. No dividend means I am not being paid to wait. There are some positives: promoter holding at 62.91% suggests owner interest aligned with minority holders. Also, the market cap of ₹26 crore is barely above the latest quarter's sales of ₹25 crore, so the stock is not being valued as a growth star. But a low price-to-sales ratio alone is not a margin of safety, especially when book value, ROE, and debt-equity are not available. In a micro-cap steel stock, unknown liabilities can be fatal. The 52-week range of ₹17.70 to ₹30.75 shows a beaten-down, low-priced security; that by itself is not a reason to buy. I need evidence of earning power returning, or a balance sheet strong enough to survive a prolonged downturn. Neither is visible from these figures. This is not a wonderful business at a fair price; it is a cyclical at a low price with deteriorating fundamentals. I would wait for a turn in steel prices, a quarter with real profit, and better financial data before deploying capital.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer