Sai Silks (KALAMANDIR)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 19/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹87.04
Market Cap₹1,282.53 Cr
P/E Ratio9.4
ROCE12.37%
ROE11.34%
Dividend Yield1.72%
Profit Growth-14.74%
Debt/Equity0.29
Sales Growth-1.02%
Promoter Holding60.97%
52-Week Range₹82.01 — ₹223.03
SectorRetailing
Book Value₹85.7

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

I begin with the numbers. Sai Silks earns an ROE of 11.34% and an ROCE of 12.37% — acceptable at a glance. The debt-to-equity of 0.25 tells me the balance sheet is not leveraged to the hilt. But Graham taught me to look past the rear-view mirror. Sales are down 8.32%, and net profit has fallen 17.12%. That is not the signature of a wonderful business compounding for shareholders. The market cap is ₹1,732 Cr, while book value per share is ₹71.13 — so I am paying 1.5 times book for a retailer whose earnings are shrinking. A 0.89% dividend yield offers little comfort while I wait. Where is the moat? Speciality retail in ethnic wear is highly competitive and fashion-fickle. I see no proprietary brand power or cost advantage that would prevent customers from walking to another store tomorrow. The 52-week range — ₹84.84 to ₹223.03 — tells me this is a volatile, cyclical business, not a predictable wealth compounder. The latest quarter does show a profit: ₹38 Cr on ₹411 Cr of sales. But with the Piotroski F-Score at 3/9, the underlying fundamentals are deteriorating across profitability, efficiency, and balance-sheet health. FairStock's 18/100 risky score aligns with my own suspicion. In Buffett's language, this is not a wonderful company at a fair price; it is a fair-to-middling company at an uncertain price. I would need strong evidence of a sustained turnaround — steady sales growth, improving margins, and better cash flow — before considering an investment. For now, there is no margin of safety.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer