K2 Infragen (K2INFRA)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹50.4 |
| Market Cap | ₹63.28 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 4.34 |
| ROCE | 18.09% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 68.53% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 76.48% |
| Promoter Holding | 39.66% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹40.8 — ₹82.8 |
| Sector | Construction |
Strengths
- P/E of 4.34 and PEG of 0.06 indicate significant undervaluation relative to recent earnings growth.
- Latest quarter annualised profit of roughly ₹28 Cr is large relative to the ₹63 Cr market cap, giving a high earnings yield.
- Sales growth of 76.48% and profit growth of 68.53% show strong momentum.
- ROCE of 18.09% and Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggest reasonable capital efficiency and financial health.
- Current price is near the lower end of the 52-week range of ₹40.80 to ₹82.80, offering a potential entry after the decline.
Concerns
- No dividend yield; shareholders rely solely on capital appreciation.
- Promoter holding at 39.66% is moderate, raising governance and alignment questions.
- Civil construction is cyclical and likely lacks a durable moat; earnings may revert.
- Insufficient data on book value, debt/equity, and ROE limits a full Graham-style analysis.
AI Analysis
Let me examine K2 Infragen as Graham would: with a market cap of ₹63 Cr and a P/E of 4.34, the market is pricing this small civil construction company at a bargain multiple. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹91 Cr and net profit of ₹7 Cr; annualised, that is roughly ₹28 Cr against a ₹63 Cr market cap. That is a remarkable earnings yield, but I have learned that a cheap price can hide a cheap business. Sales growth of 76.48% and profit growth of 68.53% are impressive, and the PEG ratio of 0.06 screams undervaluation if those numbers can continue. ROCE of 18.09% is respectable, and Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests the company is not financially distressed. Yet I must be honest: civil construction is a cyclical, competitive field, and I see no evidence of a durable moat. The promoter holding of 39.66% is moderate; it does not give me the same confidence as a genuinely founder-led, high-promoter business. With zero dividend, the entire thesis depends on reinvested growth. Also, I lack book value, ROE, and debt-equity data, so I cannot fully apply my margin-of-safety test. The 52-week range of ₹40.80 to ₹82.80 tells me Mr. Market has been emotional. At ₹50.40, this is a fast grower, not a stalwart. If the order book remains strong and the balance sheet stays clean, early investors could compound well; if the construction cycle turns, a micro-cap with moderate promoter ownership could suffer. I would keep it on my watchlist, demand more disclosures, and only buy with a margin of safety large enough to absorb the cyclical risk.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer