Jupiter Wagons (JWL)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 83/100 — HIGH CONVICTION

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹256.5
Market Cap₹10,962.05 Cr
P/E Ratio65.77
ROCE21.49%
ROE5.77%
Dividend Yield0.69%
Profit Growth15.75%
Debt/Equity0.33
Sales Growth47.6%
Free Cash Flow₹-602.74 Cr
Promoter Holding68.31%
52-Week Range₹235.65 — ₹358.25
SectorIndustrial Manufacturing
Book Value₹69.23

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me talk about Jupiter Wagons. When I look at a business, I first ask whether it is a decent business. Here we have a company with ROCE of 21.49% - that is not bad. But return on equity is just 8.77%, which tells me shareholders aren't earning much on their stake. The balance sheet is conservative, debt-to-equity only 0.14, and promoter holding at 68.31% suggests commitment. However, the recent numbers are troubling. Sales are down over 40% and profits over 52%. This is a cyclical business, tied to railway capex. In India, rail investment can be lumpy. The latest quarter shows some recovery - sales ₹776 Cr and net profit ₹58 Cr - but free cash flow is negative ₹603 Cr. That is a huge cash burn. I cannot value it on trailing earnings because they are depressed. At ₹285, the P/E is 47 times, and the Graham number is only ₹144. That gives margin of safety heavily negative, almost -85%. Even using Altman Z of 3.54 suggests the company is solvent, but solvency is not value. The market is paying a rich price for a business whose earnings have fallen sharply. I would need to see a consistent track record of profits and positive cash flows before I commit my capital. A business that consumes cash while earnings decline worries me. Yes, ROCE is decent, and the rail sector may grow, but a high price with falling fundamentals is the classic way to lose money. Let the price come down to a margin of safety, or wait until growth justifies the premium. For now, I watch from the sidelines.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer