JTL Industries (JTLIND)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 30/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹75.24
Market Cap₹2,957.55 Cr
P/E Ratio24.27
ROCE13.01%
ROE6.62%
Dividend Yield0.17%
Profit Growth143.2%
Debt/Equity0.16
Sales Growth32.7%
Promoter Holding49.26%
52-Week Range₹40.25 — ₹93.96
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹41.47

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at JTL Industries as a business, not a ticker. It is an iron and steel products company, and that immediately tells me to be careful: steel is cyclical, and current numbers confirm the cycle is soft. Sales fell 6.35%, though profit rose 4.16%. That divergence is a yellow flag—growth is coming from margins or costs, not from underlying demand. At ₹76.22, the market capitalises it at ₹2,431 Cr. I am asked to pay 30.94 times earnings and 2.50 times book value. Book value is ₹30.48, so the market is assuming a lot of future value creation. But the business returned only 6.62% on equity last year. A 6.62% ROE does not justify a 30.94 P/E unless the cycle turns dramatically. The PEG ratio of 7.44 reinforces that the current profit growth is nowhere near enough to support the multiple. The balance sheet is decent: debt/equity is only 0.13, and Piotroski F-score of 6/9 suggests no immediate distress. ROCE is 13.01%, which is respectable, but the equity holder is not seeing it. The dividend yield is a token 0.20%, so I can't wait for income while I wait for value. Promoter holding 49.26% is positive—owners have skin in the game. FairStock Score marks it 8/100, with good reason. This is not a compounding machine with pricing power; it’s a cyclical operation selling at a growth price. I would need a materially lower price or clear evidence of a durable demand recovery before investing. As Graham said, price is what you pay, value is what you get. At today’s price, the value isn't obvious.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer