Jindal Saw (JINDALSAW)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 74/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹267.1
Market Cap₹17,030.86 Cr
P/E Ratio26.11
ROCE19.37%
ROE9.86%
Dividend Yield0.75%
Profit Growth-69.84%
Debt/Equity0.38
Sales Growth12.89%
Free Cash Flow₹1,438 Cr
Promoter Holding63.25%
52-Week Range₹153 — ₹319.95
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹197.33

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹245, Jindal Saw looks cheap on the surface—P/E of 10.54 and P/B of 1.37 against book value of ₹178.43. But Graham taught me that cheapness in a cyclical business can be an illusion. Sales are down 14.26% and profits have fallen 42.20%; the latest quarter’s ₹248 Cr profit on ₹4,943 Cr sales is a thin margin. The 5-year revenue CAGR of 14.33% shows past growth, but the current decline tells me steel is in a down part of its cycle. ROCE at 19.37% is decent, yet ROE is only 9.86%, and with debt/equity at 0.43, leverage is manageable but not zero. Free cash flow of ₹1,438 Cr is genuinely positive—that is real money owners can use. Promoter holding of 63.25% is reassuring, and the Piotroski F-Score of 6 suggests the financial position is not deteriorating badly. Still, I cannot ignore the DCF figure of ₹18.85. If that is even roughly right, the market is pricing in a recovery far beyond conservative intrinsic worth. Graham Number of ₹265.74 points to asset value, but Altman Z-Score of 2.17 sits in the grey zone, and EV/EBITDA of 136.32 is a serious red flag that earnings-based valuation is not as cheap as the P/E makes it look. Dividend yield of 1.08% gives me little income protection while I wait. This is a cyclical, not a growing franchise. I want a margin of safety over the cycle, not just over book value. If earnings keep falling, a 10 P/E can become a 15 or 20 P/E with lower profits. I would keep this on my watchlist and wait for evidence of demand recovery or a meaningfully lower price.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer