Jeyyam Global (JEYYAM)
Slow GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹35.1 |
| Market Cap | ₹177.88 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.58 |
| ROCE | 17.75% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 14.57% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 1.4% |
| Promoter Holding | 65.76% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹20.55 — ₹40 |
| Sector | Food Products |
Strengths
- Attractive valuation: P/E of 7.58 and PEG of 0.67 against 14.57% profit growth
- High promoter holding of 65.76% aligns interests with minority shareholders
- Decent capital efficiency with ROCE of 17.75%
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests sound recent financial health
Concerns
- Sales growth only 1.40%, so profit growth leans on margins and cost control rather than demand
- Zero dividend yield offers no income while waiting for value to unlock
- Essential balance sheet data like book value, D/E and ROE are unavailable, limiting full Graham-style analysis
- Thin net margin of roughly 2.9% in the latest quarter leaves little room for error
AI Analysis
Let me look at Jeyyam Global the way Graham would—price first, business second. At ₹35.10, the market caps the company at ₹178 Cr and offers a P/E of just 7.58. That is cheap if the quality is real. The ROCE of 17.75% suggests management is putting capital to work decently, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 points to improving fundamentals. My value mind is drawn to the PEG ratio of 0.67: a 14.57% profit growth with a single-digit P/E is the kind of arithmetic that makes a patient investor smile. But I have to be careful. Topline growth is barely there—sales grew only 1.40%. So the profit growth is coming from margins, cost control, or other levers, not from rising demand or pricing power. In a food products business, without volume growth or a strong brand, a low P/E can be a value trap. The latest quarter shows ₹381 Cr sales and ₹11 Cr net profit—a net margin of roughly 2.9%, which tells me this is a thin-margin business. I cannot calculate ROE or book value because the data is absent. Graham insisted on knowing the balance sheet; I cannot fully trust what I cannot see. The promoter holding of 65.76% is a positive—it aligns owners with public shareholders. Dividend yield is zero, so I am not getting paid to wait. This is not a wonderful business in Buffett's sense; it's a possible slow-growing but profitable enterprise at a bargain price. I would only buy it as part of a diversified basket of small caps, with the expectation that either the topline accelerates or the margin improvement proves durable. If those don't happen, the cheapness may not be enough.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer