Jeyyam Global (JEYYAM)

Slow Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹35.1
Market Cap₹177.88 Cr
P/E Ratio7.58
ROCE17.75%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth14.57%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth1.4%
Promoter Holding65.76%
52-Week Range₹20.55 — ₹40
SectorFood Products

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Jeyyam Global the way Graham would—price first, business second. At ₹35.10, the market caps the company at ₹178 Cr and offers a P/E of just 7.58. That is cheap if the quality is real. The ROCE of 17.75% suggests management is putting capital to work decently, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 points to improving fundamentals. My value mind is drawn to the PEG ratio of 0.67: a 14.57% profit growth with a single-digit P/E is the kind of arithmetic that makes a patient investor smile. But I have to be careful. Topline growth is barely there—sales grew only 1.40%. So the profit growth is coming from margins, cost control, or other levers, not from rising demand or pricing power. In a food products business, without volume growth or a strong brand, a low P/E can be a value trap. The latest quarter shows ₹381 Cr sales and ₹11 Cr net profit—a net margin of roughly 2.9%, which tells me this is a thin-margin business. I cannot calculate ROE or book value because the data is absent. Graham insisted on knowing the balance sheet; I cannot fully trust what I cannot see. The promoter holding of 65.76% is a positive—it aligns owners with public shareholders. Dividend yield is zero, so I am not getting paid to wait. This is not a wonderful business in Buffett's sense; it's a possible slow-growing but profitable enterprise at a bargain price. I would only buy it as part of a diversified basket of small caps, with the expectation that either the topline accelerates or the margin improvement proves durable. If those don't happen, the cheapness may not be enough.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer