Jay Bee Laminati (JAYBEE)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹107 |
| Market Cap | ₹172.19 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 11.75 |
| ROCE | 32.13% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -74.39% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 42.8% |
| Promoter Holding | 70.61% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹70.1 — ₹125.05 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 70.61% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
- ROCE of 32.13% indicates historically efficient use of capital.
- Sales growth of 42.80% shows strong revenue momentum.
- P/E of 11.75 appears modest on the surface, though earnings quality is weak.
Concerns
- Profit growth is -74.39%, with latest quarter net margin only ~1.8% (₹4 Cr profit on ₹219 Cr sales).
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 points to deteriorating fundamentals.
- No dividend means minority shareholders rely entirely on capital gains.
- Critical balance-sheet data like book value, ROE, and debt/equity are unavailable, limiting risk assessment.
AI Analysis
When I look at Jay Bee Laminati, I see a business that appears to be growing on top but bleeding on the bottom. Sales rose 42.80%, yet profit fell 74.39%. In the latest quarter, ₹219 Cr of revenue produced just ₹4 Cr of net profit—a net margin under 2%. That is not the profile of a quality compounder; it is a cyclical business caught in a margin squeeze. Graham taught me to focus on earnings power, not sales headlines. A P/E of 11.75 looks cheap only if earnings are sustainable. Here, the E is collapsing, so the apparent value is an illusion. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 reinforces my caution: the fundamentals are deteriorating, not improving. The PEG ratio of 0.27 is equally misleading, because it relies on high past growth that clearly is not translating into profit. On the positive side, ROCE of 32.13% suggests the capital employed has historically generated solid returns, and promoter holding of 70.61% means owners have skin in the game. But with zero dividend and missing book value, ROE, and debt/equity data, I cannot judge the balance-sheet risk. In the steel products industry, leverage can amplify pain during downturns. The 52-week range of ₹70.10 to ₹125.05 tells me the stock has already been volatile. This is a cyclical, not a franchise. I would wait for evidence that margins are recovering and debt is manageable before deploying capital. Price is what you pay; value is what you get. Right now, I don't see a clear margin of safety.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer