Indowind Energy (INDOWIND)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹8.81 |
| Market Cap | ₹141.84 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 147.14 |
| ROCE | 1.99% |
| ROE | 0.44% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -35% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.03 |
| Sales Growth | -27% |
| Promoter Holding | 47.82% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹7 — ₹18.94 |
| Sector | Power |
| Book Value | ₹18.96 |
Strengths
- Stock trades at a meaningful discount to book value: ₹10.89 price vs ₹18.02 book value, P/B of 0.60
- Very low leverage with debt-to-equity of just 0.06, reducing financial distress risk
- Sales growth of 8.09% shows some revenue momentum
- Promoter holding of 47.82% suggests moderate alignment with minority shareholders
Concerns
- Extremely poor profitability: ROE of 0.44% and ROCE of 1.99% indicate weak earnings power
- Profit growth of -6,350% and latest quarter net profit of ₹0 Cr show severe earnings deterioration
- P/E of 147.14 and PEG of 18.19 make the valuation meaningless on an earnings basis
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 points to weak underlying financial health; no dividend provides no income support
AI Analysis
Looking at Indowind Energy, the first thing I ask is: what does this business earn for owners? Very little. Return on equity is 0.44% and return on capital employed is just 1.99%. In Graham's language, an asset that earns less than a fixed deposit is not a wonderful business, however impressive the industry label. The P/E of 147.14 confirms earnings are negligible; the profit growth of -6,350% shows deterioration, and the latest quarter's net profit is zero. Sales grew 8.09%, but that is not enough to create value when returns remain this poor. The only reason I am still sitting at the table is the balance sheet. Debt-to-equity is 0.06, book value is ₹18.02, and the stock trades at ₹10.89, or 0.60 times book. So the market is giving me a rupee of assets for sixty paise. But asset plays only work if the assets can earn a return or if management unlocks value. With 47.82% promoter holding, accountability is there, but the Piotroski score of just 4/9 reminds me that this is financially weak. There is no dividend yield, so minority shareholders are not being paid to wait. I would call this a possible asset play, not a growth story. I need proof of operational improvement, higher plant utilisation, and better capital allocation before committing capital. A cheap stock can always become cheaper.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer