Incredible Indus (INCREDIBLE)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹32.23
Market Cap₹150.72 Cr
P/E Ratio12.69
ROCE9.73%
ROE9.42%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth8.8%
Debt/Equity0.22
Sales Growth-3.1%
Promoter Holding74.96%
52-Week Range₹28.1 — ₹49.79
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹35.45

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Incredible Indus through Graham's lens. A steel products company at ₹36.99, market cap ₹164 crore. It earns a P/E of 12.74 and trades at 1.28 times book value of ₹28.96. That sounds modest, but I must ask what quality am I buying. The business has grown sales by 16.75%, yet profits fell 40.92%, and the latest quarter shows ₹189 crore sales but only ₹2 crore net profit. That is a margin of roughly one percent—a razor-thin cushion. Return on equity is 9.42%, return on capital 9.73%, barely acceptable for a commodity operation. The balance sheet is clean: debt/equity just 0.12, which gives resilience, and promoters hold 74.96%, so interests are aligned. But where is the moat? Steel products are largely price-takers, and with profit declining while sales grow, pricing power is absent. The Piotroski score of 4/9 reflects deteriorating fundamentals. At this price, the market is not charging a rich price, but a cheap multiple on weak earnings can still be a value trap. Graham would say buy with a margin of safety; here book value offers some cushion, but earnings quality is poor. Dividend yield is zero, so I wait for management to convert sales into profits. Is it a cyclical? Very likely. Steel is tied to economic cycles, so the low P/E may simply reflect trough margins. If the cycle turns, the low debt and strong promoter control could protect me; if not, ₹2 crore quarterly profit leaves little room for error. I would keep this on my watchlist, not my buy list, until margins stabilise and profit growth turns positive.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer