Hilton Met.Forg. (HILTON)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹19.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹102.42 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 20.95 |
| ROCE | 7.92% |
| ROE | 2.59% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -97.9% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.37 |
| Sales Growth | 12.8% |
| Promoter Holding | 13.71% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹13.43 — ₹56.65 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹42.97 |
Strengths
- Trades below book value: P/B 0.79 versus book value of ₹32.02, providing asset support
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates improving financial health across profitability, leverage, and efficiency
- Strong reported growth momentum: sales up 73.34% and profit up 215.56%
- Moderate leverage with debt/equity at 0.58
- Low trailing P/E of 11.70, especially relative to recent reported growth
Concerns
- Latest quarterly net profit of only ₹1 crore on ₹70 crore sales shows very thin and fragile margins
- Low promoter holding of 13.71% raises questions about long-term alignment with minority shareholders
- ROE of 7.00% and ROCE of 7.92% are mediocre and may not justify the business's capital intensity
- Zero dividend yield means shareholders receive no income while awaiting a recovery
AI Analysis
This is not the kind of business I would ordinarily spend much time on. Hilton Met.Forg. trades at ₹25.15 against a book value of ₹32.02, so the stock is selling below net asset value at a P/B of 0.79. That looks like protection, but let me be careful: a low price-to-book is only attractive when management can earn a decent return on that book. ROE is just 7.00% and ROCE is 7.92%, which means the company is not generating enough return to make me excited about putting my capital to work here. The headline growth numbers are dramatic — sales up 73.34% and profit up 215.56% — but the latest quarter tells another story: ₹70 crore of sales produced only ₹1 crore of net profit. That is razor thin. A trailing P/E of 11.70 is not necessarily cheap when margins are this fragile. The Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 does suggest improving fundamentals, and debt-to-equity of 0.58 is manageable. But promoter holding of only 13.71% bothers me a great deal. I want owners with a meaningful stake, not operators who own a small slice. The dividend yield is zero, so shareholders receive no cash while they wait. This looks like a cyclical recovery in a highly competitive castings and forgings industry, not a durable compounder. The PEG of 0.08 is a seductive number, but it is built on a low base and quarterly earnings of just ₹1 crore. I need proof of sustained margin expansion and better capital efficiency before I trust the growth story. For now, it is an asset-backed cyclical with a promising scorecard but weak underlying economics.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer