Hariom Pipe (HARIOMPIPE)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 23/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹351.9
Market Cap₹1,089.74 Cr
P/E Ratio14.39
ROCE14.11%
ROE12.39%
Dividend Yield0.16%
Profit Growth-26.47%
Debt/Equity0.62
Sales Growth-6.73%
Promoter Holding57.26%
52-Week Range₹268.05 — ₹572.2
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹208.78

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹313, Hariom Pipe is a small steel products company with a market cap of ₹1,140 Cr. The first thing I notice is the nature of the business. The latest quarter earned ₹12 Cr on sales of ₹363 Cr — a net margin of roughly 3.3%. That is a thin, commodity-like return. Steel is steel; there is little pricing power, no brand loyalty, and no customer captivity. That fails my moat test. The balance sheet is respectable but not remarkable: debt to equity is 0.69, ROE is 11.44%, and ROCE is 14.11%. Hariom earns a decent but not exceptional return on capital. The Piotroski score of 7/9 suggests the financials are not deteriorating, but I am troubled by the gap between sales growth of 21% and profit growth of only 3.38%. That tells me margins are being squeezed, likely by input costs or competitive pressure. At 18.13 times earnings and 1.78 times book value, the market is still asking for a premium for a cyclical business. The PEG ratio of 1.49 is not compelling. The stock has fallen from a 52-week high of ₹572 to ₹313, which may look like an opportunity, but for a cyclical I prefer single-digit P/E and a lower price-to-book. With a dividend yield of just 0.17%, I am not being paid to wait. Promoter holding of 57.26% is a positive, and low leverage helps, but this remains a capital-intensive commodity business with thin margins and no durable competitive edge. It may be a decent operator, but it is not a wonderful business. I would wait for a wider margin of safety and evidence that margins can hold through the cycle.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer