Hariom Pipe (HARIOMPIPE)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 23/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹351.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,089.74 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 14.39 |
| ROCE | 14.11% |
| ROE | 12.39% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% |
| Profit Growth | -26.47% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.62 |
| Sales Growth | -6.73% |
| Promoter Holding | 57.26% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹268.05 — ₹572.2 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹208.78 |
Strengths
- Sales growing at 21%, showing demand traction
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates sound financial health
- Promoter holding at 57.26% aligns owner interest
- Moderate debt-to-equity of 0.69 and positive ROE/ROCE
Concerns
- Profit growth of 3.38% lags far behind sales growth, implying margin compression
- P/E of 18.13 is rich for a cyclical steel business
- Stock down from ₹572 to ₹313 could signal deteriorating cycle, not bargain
- Dividend yield of 0.17% offers negligible downside support
AI Analysis
At ₹313, Hariom Pipe is a small steel products company with a market cap of ₹1,140 Cr. The first thing I notice is the nature of the business. The latest quarter earned ₹12 Cr on sales of ₹363 Cr — a net margin of roughly 3.3%. That is a thin, commodity-like return. Steel is steel; there is little pricing power, no brand loyalty, and no customer captivity. That fails my moat test. The balance sheet is respectable but not remarkable: debt to equity is 0.69, ROE is 11.44%, and ROCE is 14.11%. Hariom earns a decent but not exceptional return on capital. The Piotroski score of 7/9 suggests the financials are not deteriorating, but I am troubled by the gap between sales growth of 21% and profit growth of only 3.38%. That tells me margins are being squeezed, likely by input costs or competitive pressure. At 18.13 times earnings and 1.78 times book value, the market is still asking for a premium for a cyclical business. The PEG ratio of 1.49 is not compelling. The stock has fallen from a 52-week high of ₹572 to ₹313, which may look like an opportunity, but for a cyclical I prefer single-digit P/E and a lower price-to-book. With a dividend yield of just 0.17%, I am not being paid to wait. Promoter holding of 57.26% is a positive, and low leverage helps, but this remains a capital-intensive commodity business with thin margins and no durable competitive edge. It may be a decent operator, but it is not a wonderful business. I would wait for a wider margin of safety and evidence that margins can hold through the cycle.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer