Halder Venture (HALDER)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹301.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹375.51 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 11.77 |
| ROCE | 16.18% |
| ROE | 192.36% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% |
| Profit Growth | 12.9% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.97 |
| Sales Growth | 84.8% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.84% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹206.95 — ₹311.55 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹4.88 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding at 73.84% aligns owner-manager interest and reduces minority agency risk.
- Latest quarter net margin of ~14.5% (₹21 Cr profit on ₹145 Cr sales) suggests decent profitability on current activity.
- ROCE of 16.18% shows operating capital can generate a reasonable return despite the tiny book value.
- Profit fell only 3.01% despite a 59.24% collapse in sales, indicating some cost flexibility or non-operating cushion.
Concerns
- Extreme valuation: P/E of 76.67 and P/B of 50.28 against book value of ₹4.88 provide no margin of safety.
- Sales growth of -59.24% shows severe top-line erosion with no visible growth trajectory.
- Debt-to-equity of 1.99 on a very small equity base threatens solvency if working-capital stress or losses emerge.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 signals deteriorating financial health; the reported ₹21 Cr quarterly profit also conflicts with the trailing P/E implied annual profit.
AI Analysis
At ₹245, Halder Venture looks like the kind of stock Benjamin Graham would circle twice—once to write down the price, once to cross it out. A P/E of 76.67 on a business whose sales have fallen by 59.24% is not a value proposition; it is a hope trade. The book value is only ₹4.88 per share, so paying ₹245 means paying over 50 times net worth for an agricultural processor with no obvious moat. I cannot identify any durable competitive advantage from these numbers. Yes, promoter holding at 73.84% is reassuring in a minority-oppressive market, and a 16.18% ROCE is not disgraceful. But the return on equity of 192% is a mirage caused by a tiny equity base, not by pricing power. A 1.99 debt-to-equity ratio on an equity base of roughly ₹6 crore means the balance sheet is leveraged thin. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 reinforces the smell of financial deterioration. The most troubling point: the latest quarter shows net profit of ₹21 crore, yet the trailing P/E implies annual profit of only ₹4 crore. I don't know which number to trust, so I trust neither. Graham said to let the figures speak; these speak clearly. When sales collapse, margins are suspect, leverage is high, and the price is in the nosebleed section, the margin of safety is absent. This is not a business I would ever own. At best it is a cyclical trading vehicle; as an investor, I wait for an honest balance sheet, a lower price, and evidence that the decline has reversed.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer