GTPL Hathway (GTPL)

Asset Play

FairStock Score: 42/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 1/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹52.89
Market Cap₹594.82 Cr
P/E Ratio78.94
ROCE5.9%
ROE2.24%
Dividend Yield3.78%
Profit Growth-77.7%
Debt/Equity0.4
Sales Growth12.4%
Free Cash Flow₹53,12,000 Cr
Promoter Holding75%
52-Week Range₹50.57 — ₹118.95
SectorEntertainment
Book Value₹102.28

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me examine GTPL Hathway with a cold eye. On first glance, the market cap is ₹657 Cr and the price is ₹68, while book value stands at ₹83.21. I am naturally drawn to a stock trading at 0.82 times book. But Graham taught me that a bargain must also be a decent business, or at least a source of earnings. Here the ROE is just 2.24%, and ROCE is 5.90%. That tells me the company is not compounding shareholder wealth impressively; it earns very little on the assets it employs. Debt/equity is 0.40, which is manageable, and promoter holding at 75% aligns owners with management. A Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests the balance sheet is not deteriorating, and a 3.42% dividend yield offers some reward while waiting. Yet growth is pedestrian: sales up 5.11%, profits up 8.26%. A PEG of 2.37 says I am paying more than the growth justifies. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹933 Cr but net profit of only ₹12 Cr—razor-thin margins. This is not a franchise with pricing power; it is a low-margin distributor/operator whose moat, if any, comes from local infrastructure and a high promoter stake. The stock has fallen from ₹120.38 to ₹68, so the market is worried. As a value investor, I would call this a possible asset play: price below book, but returns on capital fail to excite. I want a margin of safety in both assets and earning power. Here the asset margin exists, but earning power is weak. I would not rush in; I need to see higher ROE or a clearer catalyst to unlock that book value.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer