Godrej Consumer (GODREJCP)

Stalwart

FairStock Score: 62/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹934.3
Market Cap₹95,607.38 Cr
P/E Ratio49.99
ROCE19.21%
ROE15.18%
Dividend Yield2.14%
Profit Growth42.24%
Debt/Equity0.35
Sales Growth76.41%
Free Cash Flow₹2,234 Cr
Promoter Holding53.06%
52-Week Range₹855.9 — ₹1,273.9
SectorPersonal Products
Book Value₹123.61

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Godrej Consumer is a decent business, but the price tests my patience. At ₹1,142.45, the market cap is ₹1.25 lakh crore. Graham would say: first measure the business, then the price. The business has qualities I respect: trusted personal care brands, a promoter holding of 53.06%, and a sound balance sheet—debt/equity is just 0.34, Altman Z is 5.79, Piotroski F-score is 8/9, and free cash flow is ₹2,234 crore. Returns on capital are respectable: ROCE 19.21%, ROE 15.18%. Latest quarter sales ₹4,099 crore and net profit ₹498 crore show steady execution. Profit growth of 11.97% is ahead of sales growth of 7.29%, which indicates some margin discipline. But here is the problem: valuation. A P/E of 64.13 and P/B of 9.74 are rich. EV/EBITDA at 143.24 is extreme. The Graham Number is ₹216.78; even the DCF value of ₹467.12 is far below the market price. That gives no margin of safety—rather, it is dangerously overvalued. The five-year revenue CAGR is only 5.43%, so this is not a fast grower. The quoted PEG of 0.57 does not reconcile with 11.97% profit growth, so I give it little weight. The FairStock Score of 56/100 labels it Steady, and I agree. For a retail investor, buying here means hoping the future becomes exceptional. Buffett's rule: be fearful when others are greedy. I'd rather miss a good company at a foolish price than overpay. Godrej Consumer is a stalwart franchise, but at this price I would wait, monitor volume growth, and demand a better entry point.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer