Gillanders Arbut (GILLANDERS)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹89 |
| Market Cap | ₹189.95 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 20.09 |
| ROCE | 6.8% |
| ROE | 1.22% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 65.69% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.58 |
| Sales Growth | 3.4% |
| Promoter Holding | 69.05% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹76 — ₹129.4 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹120.86 |
Strengths
- Discount to book value: P/B of 0.76 with book value ₹120.77 against price ₹92
- Promoter holding of 69.05% aligns majority ownership with minority investors
- Moderate valuation with P/E of 12.76
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some fundamental improvement
- Debt/equity of 0.58 is manageable
Concerns
- Very low ROE of 1.22% and weak ROCE of 6.80%
- Sales growth is negative at -16.30%, showing a contracting top line
- Profit growth of 65.69% comes on a falling revenue base and may not be sustainable
- No dividend yield at 0.00%, so shareholders receive no cash return
AI Analysis
Let me first say what this is not: a wonderful business. Tea and coffee are commodity products; buyers do not pay a premium for a name, and sellers rarely control price. With ROE of just 1.22% and ROCE of 6.80%, Gillanders Arbut is earning a poor return on the capital it employs. A shareholder should demand far more. The stock at ₹92 is cheaper than book value of ₹120.77, so a Graham-type investor might feel some asset protection. But assets are only worth what they can produce in cash, and right now they are not producing much. Sales fell 16.30% — a serious signal. The reported profit growth of 65.69% looks exciting, but it comes with a falling top line; it may be cost cutting, a low base, or a one-time gain. Latest quarter's net profit of ₹5 Cr on sales of ₹107 Cr is a thin margin. I would not use the PEG ratio of 0.19 — a PEG based on one year's rebound from a poor base is dangerous. On the positive side, P/E of 12.76 is not demanding, and debt/equity of 0.58 is manageable, though I would prefer less. Promoter holding of 69.05% is good alignment. The Piotroski score of 6/9 hints at some improvement. But there is zero dividend, which never pleases a shareholder who wants cash returns. This has the look of a possible turnaround rather than a durable grower. If it cannot improve ROE and revive sales, the discount to book could persist or widen. I would keep position small, watch quarterly numbers, and demand evidence of margin stability and debt reduction before calling it a strong value idea.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer