GACM Tech (GATECH)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹0.76
Market Cap₹98.22 Cr
P/E Ratio10.86
ROCE16.43%
ROE10.94%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-49.78%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-26.05%
Promoter Holding0.91%
52-Week Range₹0.4 — ₹1.11
SectorFinance
Book Value₹0.9

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, GACM Tech looks like a Graham special: P/E of 7.25, P/B of 1.09, and a book value of ₹0.44 against a share price of ₹0.48. But cheapness is only the starting point. The business earned 16.35% on equity and 16.43% on capital employed, which is respectable on paper. The trouble is the trend: profit declined 26.71% while sales grew only 4.92%. In other words, the company is making more revenue but producing less profit—a sign of pricing pressure, rising costs, or poor capital allocation. I do not see a moat here. This is a tiny player in 'other financial services,' with a market cap of just ₹63 crore and latest quarterly sales of ₹4 crore. There is no dividend, so as a minority shareholder I am entirely dependent on management creating value. That is uncomfortable when promoter holding is only 0.91%. Those who control the company have almost no economic ownership; that is a serious governance red flag in any market, but especially in India for a small financial-services company. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 tells me the financial health is deteriorating, not improving. The P/E is low, but a falling 'E' can make a low multiple become a high multiple next year. At ₹0.48, near its 52-week low of ₹0.40, the market has no enthusiasm. Graham would ask whether the asset backing provides protection. Book value is ₹0.44, so the downside is partly cushioned, but if earnings keep sliding, book value can erode too. I need evidence of a genuine turnaround before investing. I am not going to pay even ₹0.48 for a shrunken, poorly governed business just because it looks cheap.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer