Integra Essentia (ESSENTIA)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹1.38 |
| Market Cap | ₹242.23 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 49.6 |
| ROCE | 4.72% |
| ROE | 1.84% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.26 |
| Sales Growth | 43.5% |
| Promoter Holding | 15.97% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1.01 — ₹2.08 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹1.34 |
Strengths
- Trades at ₹1.37 against book value of ₹1.68, a P/B of 0.82, creating an asset-based discount.
- Debt/equity is low at 0.23, so the balance sheet is not highly leveraged.
- Sales grew 12.37%, indicating some expansion in trading activity.
- Latest quarter revenue of ₹140 Cr gives the company a meaningful scale relative to its ₹140 Cr market cap.
Concerns
- ROE of 1.84% and ROCE of 4.72% are very weak; net profit of ₹1 Cr on sales of ₹140 Cr shows negligible margins.
- P/E of 49.60 with zero profit growth and a PEG of 4.01 makes the earnings valuation expensive.
- Promoter holding of just 15.97% raises serious governance and alignment concerns.
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and no dividend yield offer little evidence of improving financial health.
AI Analysis
Let me start with what I see. Integra Essentia is a trading and distribution company, and my first rule is that a business without pricing power is hard to build wealth with. The numbers confirm that. In the latest quarter, it booked ₹140 Cr of sales but produced just ₹1 Cr of net profit. That is a razor-thin margin, and it explains why ROE is only 1.84% and ROCE just 4.72%. For a business earning such low returns on invested capital, I do not want to pay a high multiple. The stock sells at 49.60 times earnings even though profit growth is exactly zero. The PEG ratio above 4 tells me the growth is either absent or far too expensive. So on an earnings basis, there is no margin of safety. What interests me is the balance sheet. Book value is ₹1.68 per share, while the stock trades at ₹1.37, so the market is valuing the company at 0.82 times book. That is a Graham-style statistical discount. But I have to ask why it is cheap. Debt-equity is low at 0.23, which is fine, but promoter holding of only 15.97% is a major warning. I like managers who have their own wealth at stake; this is far too low. The Piotroski F-Score of 4 out of 9 also suggests the company is not showing enough financial strength. No dividend means shareholders receive nothing while waiting for value to appear. Sales growth of 12.37% is nice, but it is not translating into profit growth. That is the classic sign of a trading business with no moat. This is, at best, an asset play — not a compounder. If book value is real, maybe there is room, but a cheap stock with weak returns and poor governance can stay cheap for a long time.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer