Esconet (ESCONET)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹320 |
| Market Cap | ₹395.52 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 25.1 |
| ROCE | 17.85% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -32.27% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 35.77% |
| Promoter Holding | 60.19% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹91.25 — ₹320 |
| Sector | IT - Hardware |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 35.77% shows strong demand and business momentum
- ROCE of 17.85% indicates reasonable capital efficiency
- Promoter holding at 60.19% aligns management with minority shareholders
- Latest quarterly sales of ₹142 Cr suggest a high revenue base relative to market cap
Concerns
- Profit growth is -32.27% despite strong sales growth, indicating severe margin compression
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹1 Cr on ₹142 Cr sales implies extremely thin margins
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals weak financial health and deterioration
- P/E of 25.10 is expensive for a business with falling profits and no dividend
AI Analysis
At ₹133.15, Esconet carries a market cap of ₹155 Cr and a P/E of 25.10. This is not the kind of business I would call a wonderful compounder. Revenue growth of 35.77% sounds attractive, but profit is down 32.27%, and the latest quarter shows only ₹1 Cr net profit on ₹142 Cr of sales. That is a razor-thin margin — a serious warning sign in a hardware business that likely lacks pricing power. A Graham-style investor asks what the earnings yield truly is. At 25 times earnings, you are paying a rich price for a business whose profits are shrinking. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 reinforces my caution; fundamentals are deteriorating, not strengthening. ROCE of 17.85% is respectable, but with no dividend, no book value data, and an unclear balance sheet, I cannot build a margin of safety. Promoter holding of 60.19% is good for alignment, but alignment cannot compensate for weak economics. The 52-week range of ₹91.25 to ₹280.00 shows how volatile this stock has been; Mr. Market is emotional. The PEG ratio of 0.70 appears to promise cheap growth, but with actual profit growth negative, I would not trust that number. This looks like a potential turnaround, not a stable stalwart. If management can convert high sales into better margins and improved cash generation, the operating leverage could work. Until I see consistent profitability, a stronger F-score, and proof of a durable competitive moat, I will stay on the sidelines.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer