Equippp Social (EQUIPPP)

Fast Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹21.5
Market Cap₹221.65 Cr
P/E Ratio119.44
ROCE10.96%
ROE12.76%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-33.3%
Debt/Equity0.74
Sales Growth117.6%
Promoter Holding87.35%
52-Week Range₹13.97 — ₹25.25
SectorIT - Software
Book Value₹0.97

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

When I look at Equippp Social, I see a business with a wonderful growth story but not yet a wonderful economics story. The stock trades at ₹16.72, giving a market cap of ₹185 Cr. That is 76.57 times earnings and 25.33 times book value, while book value is just ₹0.66 per share. Graham taught me that price is what you pay, value is what you get, and here the margin of safety is thin. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹12 Cr but net profit of ₹0 Cr, and the return on equity is -3.60%. So the reported profit growth of 220% is from a tiny, fragile base. Sales growth of 2310% sounds spectacular, but such numbers rarely appear in predictable, durable compounding businesses. In the short run, Mr. Market can reward hope, but in the long run, earnings matter. ROCE is 10.96% and Piotroski F-Score is 7/9, which are encouraging signals. Debt/equity of 0.72 is manageable, and promoter holding of 87.35% does align interests. But high promoter holding also means low free float and liquidity risk. With zero dividend yield, the retail investor must rely entirely on capital appreciation. The PEG ratio of 0.06 is seductive, but it assumes 220% profit growth is durable and that those profits actually arrive. I need more proof. A 52-week range of ₹13.97 to ₹25.25 tells me this is a speculative mover, not a steady compounder. Equippp Social may be a fast grower in revenue terms, but at 76 times earnings and 25 times book, I am not being paid to take that risk today. I would keep it on the watchlist and wait for consistent earnings and a better price.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer