Epack Durable (EPACK)
Slow GrowerFairStock Score: 20/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹215.47 |
| Market Cap | ₹2,073.44 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 633.74 |
| ROCE | 9.7% |
| ROE | 5.74% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -48.5% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.77 |
| Sales Growth | 33.8% |
| Promoter Holding | 47.18% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹184 — ₹394.05 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹119.05 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 13.51% shows the business is expanding its topline.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates reasonably sound operational and financial health.
- Promoter holding of 47.18% aligns promoter interests with minority shareholders.
- Debt/Equity of 0.76 is not excessive, giving some financial flexibility.
Concerns
- P/E of 58.28 and PEG of 6.98 are far too high for profit growth of only 3.19%.
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹3 Cr on sales of ₹428 Cr shows extremely thin margins.
- ROE of 5.74% and ROCE of 9.70% reflect weak capital efficiency.
- No dividend and a FairStock Score of 8/100 (RISKY) offer no downside cushion.
AI Analysis
At ₹240.80, this looks like the kind of stock I would normally leave alone. Epack Durable operates in household appliances, a fiercely competitive industry where you need strong brand pull, scale, or a genuine cost advantage to earn attractive returns on capital. The numbers here don't show that. Return on equity is just 5.74%, and ROCE is 9.70% — hardly the hallmark of a great business. The latest quarter is even more telling: ₹428 Cr of sales generated only ₹3 Cr of net profit, a razor-thin margin. That leaves no margin of safety for a shareholder. Meanwhile, the market is asking 58.28 times earnings, while profit growth is only 3.19%. The PEG ratio of 6.98 tells me the price already assumes a massive acceleration that isn't showing up in actual performance. Debt-to-equity of 0.76 is manageable, but not comforting for a low-ROE business, and there is zero dividend to reward patient investors while waiting. On the positive side, sales grew at 13.51%, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 shows some operational discipline. Promoter holding of 47.18% also keeps management aligned with shareholders. But these positives cannot justify this price. Benjamin Graham would say the margin of safety is missing entirely. With a FairStock Score of 8/100, this is clearly risky. I want to see meaningful margin expansion and a much lower valuation before this becomes an interesting value proposition.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer