Energy-Mission (EMMIL)

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Lowish P/E of 11.92 with profit growth of 16.81% gives a PEG of 1.15.
• High ROCE of 21.45% suggests efficient capital allocation.
• Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates healthy fundamentals and improving operational quality.
• Promoter holding at 73.76% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
• Latest quarter net margin is roughly 9.3%, with ₹7 crore profit on ₹75 crore sales.

Concerns

• Sales growth is only 3.93%; profit growth may be margin-driven and may not be durable.
• No dividend yield, so investors must rely entirely on capital appreciation.
• Book value, ROE, and debt-to-equity are unavailable, making it hard to assess leverage and downside protection.
• Small market cap of ₹161 crore and a 52-week range of ₹110-₹208 indicate price volatility and possible liquidity risk.

AI Analysis

Energy-Mission has the raw numbers of a potential Graham-style bargain, but it also hides enough that I would not write a check today. At ₹158 with a market cap of ₹161 crore and a P/E of 11.92, the earnings yield is roughly 8.4%—a respectable starting return if the earnings are real and sustainable. The ROCE of 21.45% suggests the business puts capital to work efficiently, and the Piotroski F-score of 7/9 supports a picture of improving profitability and healthy fundamentals. The latest quarter sales of ₹75 crore and net profit of ₹7 crore give a net margin near 9.3%, which is not extraordinary but acceptable. Promoter holding of 73.76% is a positive; in a ₹161 crore small-cap, alignment with minority shareholders matters immensely. Yet I cannot ignore the discrepancy between sales growth of 3.93% and profit growth of 16.81%. A company can expand margins for a few years, but without revenue growth, profit growth will eventually flatten. I do not see a clear moat in the numbers; industrial products can be cyclical and price-sensitive. More importantly, book value, ROE, and debt-equity are not disclosed in this data. As Graham would say, the balance sheet is the anchor of the analysis. Without it, I cannot calculate downside support. The dividend yield is zero, so there is no income while I wait. The 52-week range of ₹110 to ₹208 reminds me that this stock can move sharply in both directions. A PEG of 1.15 is reasonable, but it is not a margin of safety by itself. I need more years of data, cash flow statements, and a clear picture of leverage before calling this a compounding machine. It is a high-quality candidate on the watchlist, not a conviction buy yet.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer