Emami Realty Ltd (EMAMIREAL)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹75.27 |
| Market Cap | ₹391.66 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -1.92% |
| ROE | 270.74% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -91.47% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 435.1% |
| Promoter Holding | 68.45% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹48.2 — ₹121.35 |
| Sector | Realty |
| Book Value | ₹-56.58 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 68.45% aligns insiders with public shareholders.
- Current price of ₹75.63 is about 41% below the 52-week high of ₹129, so expectations are already low.
- Trades closer to the 52-week low of ₹48.20 than the high, reducing room for optimism-driven downside.
- Latest quarter still shows ₹5 Cr of revenue, indicating some operating activity remains.
- Small market cap of ₹289 Cr means a meaningful asset sale or recapitalisation could have an outsized impact.
Concerns
- Negative book value of ₹-33.03 and Debt/Equity N/A indicate liabilities exceed assets.
- Latest quarterly net loss of ₹37 Cr is far larger than revenue of ₹5 Cr, implying severe cash burn.
- Sales and profit growth both fell over 91% year-on-year, showing a collapse in scale.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and ROCE of -1.92% point to very weak financial health; dividend yield is zero.
AI Analysis
Let me start with what the figures actually say. Emami Realty has a market capitalisation of ₹289 Cr, but a negative book value of ₹-33 per share. That means liabilities exceed assets, so the equity cushion is gone. The P/E is meaningless at 0.00, and the reported ROE of 270.74% is an arithmetic distortion of negative equity, not evidence of profitability. In the latest quarter, revenue was ₹5 Cr and the net loss was ₹37 Cr. Sales and profit growth have both collapsed by over 91% year-on-year. This is a capital-consuming enterprise, not a compounding machine. The ROCE of -1.92% and Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 tell the same story: weak operations and poor financial health. A business without positive book value, without earnings, and with negative operating returns has no moat. Real estate is competitive, cyclical, and execution-heavy; nothing here protects returns from competition or capital erosion. The only positives I can find in the data are promoter holding of 68.45%, which aligns insiders with outside shareholders, and a price near the lower part of the 52-week range of ₹48.20 to ₹129.00, meaning many hopes have already been dashed. But a low price is not a margin of safety. Graham would demand net current assets or tangible book value behind the share price; here book value is negative. This is not a valuation exercise—it is a turnaround speculation. I cannot call myself an investor in a business whose current path is burning cash and destroying value. Unless management raises equity, sells projects, or materially reduces losses, the levers of value creation are absent. I would watch from a safe distance.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer