Eppeltone Ene. (EEPL)
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹117.45 |
| Market Cap | ₹194.39 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 14.44 |
| ROCE | 32.04% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 55.33% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -7.75% |
| Promoter Holding | 61.78% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹91 — ₹170 |
| Sector | Electrical Equipment |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹117.45, Eppeltone trades at 14.4 times earnings, a reasonable price for a company earning 32% on capital employed. But I first ask: what is the quality of the earnings? Sales have declined 7.75%, yet profit jumped 55.33%. That is a red flag. In my experience, when revenue falls and profit rises, the source is often cost-cutting, one-off gains, or favorable input prices—not durable business strength. The latest quarter shows ₹46 crore sales and ₹6 crore net profit, a 13% margin, which is unusually high for electrical equipment. I would want to see this margin sustained for several more quarters before trusting it. The positive side: promoter holding is 61.78%, so owners are aligned. ROCE of 32% is excellent, and the Piotroski score of 6 suggests decent financial health. The PEG of 0.26 looks cheap only if the 55% profit growth is repeatable; if sales keep falling, that growth will fade. There is no dividend, so shareholders depend entirely on capital appreciation and reinvested earnings. Graham would insist on a margin of safety. With no book value, debt/equity, or ROE disclosed, I cannot judge the balance sheet properly. A 52-week range of ₹91 to ₹170 shows volatility. The market cap is only ₹194 crore, making it a small cap that could be illiquid. I would not buy without understanding why sales are falling and whether the profit rise comes from operations or accounting. Let the figures prove themselves.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer