Dwarikesh Sugar (DWARKESH)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 2/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹42.95
Market Cap₹795.87 Cr
P/E Ratio55.06
ROCE5.48%
ROE2.64%
Dividend Yield0.23%
Profit Growth-174.2%
Debt/Equity0.41
Sales Growth-11.31%
Promoter Holding42.1%
52-Week Range₹32.13 — ₹59.89
SectorAgricultural Food & other Products
Book Value₹44.72

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, Dwarikesh Sugar looks cheap on book value—₹41.89 per share against a price of ₹47.25—but cheapness can be an illusion in a commodity business. Sugar is sugar; there is no durable moat, no pricing power, and earnings will swing with cane costs and market prices. The trailing P/E of 34.96 tells me the market is paying up for a recent jump in profit, and the 43.90% profit growth sounds impressive until I see that sales growth is only 3.97%. That kind of divergence is rarely a sign of franchise strength; it is more often a cyclical earnings rebound from a low base. The return figures confirm my caution: ROE of 2.64% and ROCE of 5.48% are poor. Even with modest debt—D/E of 0.23 and a Piotroski score of 7 out of 9—the business is not earning an attractive return on capital. Graham would ask for a margin of safety. At P/B 1.13, I get some asset protection, but a P/E of 35 for a sugar producer in a cyclical industry offers no margin in earnings. The latest quarter shows net profit of ₹15 Cr on sales of ₹325 Cr, a margin of about 4.6%, which is better than the trailing numbers—so maybe the cycle is turning. But I am not willing to pay a growth premium for a commodity. Promoter holding of 42.10% is decent, and the dividend yield of 1.34% gives a small return while I wait. Still, with a FairStock Score of 22/100, the risk is high. This is a cyclical asset play, not a compounding machine. I need evidence that returns on capital are structurally improving, not just one good quarter, before I would consider investing.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer