Divi's Lab. (DIVISLAB)

Stalwart

FairStock Score: 54/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹8,477
Market Cap₹2,25,037.7 Cr
P/E Ratio87.72
ROCE20.44%
ROE16.56%
Dividend Yield0.35%
Profit Growth65.7%
Debt/Equity0
Sales Growth27.8%
Free Cash Flow₹849 Cr
Promoter Holding51.88%
52-Week Range₹5,636.5 — ₹10,000
SectorPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Book Value₹631.37

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Divi's Lab as an owner, not a trader. Quality is not the problem. This is a financially exceptional business: return on equity is 16.56%, return on capital employed is 20.44%, debt is almost nonexistent at 0.01 times equity, and free cash flow is ₹849 crore. The Piotroski score of 8/9 and Altman Z of 8.17 tell me the balance sheet is a fortress. Promoters own 51.88%, so my interests are aligned. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹2,604 crore and net profit of ₹583 crore, with sales up 13.62% and profit up 19.93%. That momentum is real. But valuation stops me cold. At ₹6,378.75, the market cap is ₹1.70 lakh crore. I am being asked to pay 67.16 times earnings and 11.31 times book value, with a dividend yield of 0.47%. The PEG ratio of 4.35 says the growth is already more than paid for. Graham's defensive number is ₹1,088.39, and DCF says ₹524.98; my margin of safety is minus 488.81%. That is not investing, it is hope. Worse, the 5-year revenue CAGR is only 6.08%. A company growing revenue in the mid single digits over a cycle does not deserve a 67 P/E, no matter how good the business. The recent acceleration in sales and profit is encouraging, but I cannot rely on a few quarters to justify a price six times Graham's estimate. Even a wonderful business purchased at too high a price can produce poor returns. Divi's is a fine company, but the price embeds enormous optimism. As Graham said, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here I would get far less. I would wait for a margin of safety.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer