Debock Industrie (DIL)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹0.76 |
| Market Cap | ₹12.37 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 1.01 |
| ROCE | -0.77% |
| ROE | 2.77% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 5% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -100% |
| Promoter Holding | 9.41% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.65 — ₹2.44 |
| Sector | Leisure Services |
| Book Value | ₹13.2 |
Strengths
- Trades at a deep discount to book value: P/B of 0.08 with book value ₹13.71 against price ₹1.07.
- Small market cap of ₹22 Cr could attract restructuring or asset-sale interest.
- Latest quarter shows near-zero net loss, so the company is not burning significant cash.
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 implies modest financial stability, not a completely broken balance sheet.
Concerns
- No operating revenue: latest quarter sales are ₹0 Cr and sales growth is -100%.
- Promoter holding is just 9.41%, indicating weak insider alignment with minority shareholders.
- ROCE is negative at -0.77% and ROE is only 2.77%, so capital is not being deployed productively.
- No dividend and effectively no earnings, leaving shareholders with no current return while waiting.
AI Analysis
Let me be blunt: I am not looking at a business. Debock Industrie, listed as a hotel and resorts company, has no sales in the latest quarter and sales growth of -100%. The 5% profit growth figure is cosmetic when the net profit is effectively zero. Graham taught us to start with the economics of the business, not with the price. Here the return on capital fails: ROCE is -0.77%, ROE is only 2.77%. The company is not earning a satisfactory return on the equity invested. So what draws me in? The balance sheet. The shares trade at ₹1.07 against book value of ₹13.71 — a P/B of 0.08. That is an 92% discount to stated net worth, an extreme margin of safety in accounting terms. But margin of safety in accounting terms is not enough. I need to know whether the assets are real, whether they can be monetised, and whether minority shareholders will see any value. Promoter holding of 9.41% is a red flag: insiders have very little skin in the game. Debt/equity is not disclosed, and with zero revenue, any hidden liability could eat into book value. The Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 is mediocre — not the picture of financial strength you want in a deep-value situation. There is no dividend, and the market cap is just ₹22 Cr, so it remains under the radar. This is an asset play, not a compounder. It may reward patient investors if assets are sold or restructured, but it could also remain a penny stock forever. I would need a catalyst, better capital allocation, and proof that book value is real. Cheapness alone is not enough.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer