Dhanlaxmi Crop (DHANLAXMI)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹30.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹41.72 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.18 |
| ROCE | 35.36% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -43.48% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.22 |
| Sales Growth | -76% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.97% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹20.05 — ₹37.8 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹30.98 |
Strengths
- P/E of 8.18 and P/B of 1.00 (price ₹30.90 vs book value ₹30.98) provide a valuation close to asset value.
- Low leverage: D/E of 0.22; the balance sheet is not stretched.
- ROCE at 35.36% suggests efficient capital use if recent operating levels can be stabilised.
- Latest quarter is profitable: ₹29 Cr sales and ₹5 Cr net profit.
- Promoter holding at 73.97% aligns owner-manager interests with minority shareholders.
Concerns
- Sales growth of -76% and profit growth of -43.48% signal severe business contraction and uncertain earnings.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health and poor earnings quality.
- No dividend yield (0.00%) provides no income cushion while waiting for recovery.
- ROE is N/A, and high ROCE may be distorted by the collapsed revenue base.
AI Analysis
This is a small, commodity-linked agricultural business, and I must begin with the most important truth: a low price is not the same as a bargain. At ₹30.90, Dhanlaxmi Crop trades at a P/E of 8.18 and exactly around book value of ₹30.98. That looks like a Graham-style margin of safety, and the balance sheet is not highly leveraged, with debt/equity of only 0.22. But the figures in front of me tell a different story underneath. Sales have fallen 76%, and profit is down 43.48%. A business that shrinks this fast is not a stable wealth-compounder. The latest quarter shows ₹29 Cr sales and ₹5 Cr profit, but one quarter is a snapshot, not a durable stream. ROCE of 35.36% is eye-catching, yet with such contraction I suspect the ratio is less about quality and more about a shrunken capital base. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 is a clear warning: financial health has weakened. There is no dividend, so the investor must rely on capital appreciation, a fragile proposition when earnings are volatile. On the positive side, 73.97% promoter holding means owners are aligned, but even high promoter ownership cannot replace earnings power. Benjamin Graham would say the numbers must be tested over time. I do not see a wide moat in other agricultural products; prices are driven by monsoon, crop cycles, and market prices, not by pricing power. At book value I am not overpaying for the asset, but I am also not receiving a franchise. This may be cyclical, or it may be a value trap. I would only invest after evidence of stabilised sales, improved F-score, and a few quarters of consistent profit. Until then, patience is the better companion.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer