Creative Eye (CREATIVEYE)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹6.2 |
| Market Cap | ₹12.44 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 0.72% |
| ROE | -23.4% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 58.75% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.45 |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 56.26% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹5.27 — ₹8.83 |
| Sector | Entertainment |
| Book Value | ₹7.54 |
Strengths
- Stock trades at ₹7.19 against book value of ₹10.92 (P/B 0.66), offering a potential margin of safety.
- Promoter holding of 56.26% aligns insider interests with minority shareholders.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some financial fundamentals are not deteriorating.
- Small market cap of ₹13 Cr leaves room for a special-situation or asset-recovery outcome.
Concerns
- Latest quarter sales are ₹0 Cr with a net loss of ₹4 Cr; core operations are not generating revenue.
- ROE of -23.40% indicates shareholder capital is being eroded rapidly.
- Negative earnings make P/E meaningless, and the 58.75% profit growth is off a negative base.
- No dividend and zero cash return; continued losses could reduce book value further.
AI Analysis
Let me start with the obvious: this is not a business I can admire. Creative Eye is in media and entertainment, yet the latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 Cr and a net loss of ₹4 Cr. When a company generates no revenue, there is no moat, no pricing power, no customer franchise—there is only a pile of assets waiting to be put to work or consumed by overhead. The balance sheet appears to hold some value: book value is ₹10.92 per share and the stock trades at ₹7.19, a P/B of 0.66. That looks like a classic Graham cigar-butt, but book value only matters if management can earn a return on it or shareholders can realise it. ROE is -23.40%, so the underlying capital is shrinking. ROCE at 0.72% does not even cover the cost of capital. Profit growth of 58.75% is misleading because the base is negative; a loss turning slightly less bad is not growth. The Piotroski score of 6/9 hints at some financial repair, and promoter holding of 56.26% does align owners with management, but high ownership in a value-destroying, no-revenue business is cold comfort. There is no dividend, so the only possible return is asset realisation or an eventual turnaround. At ₹13 Cr market cap, the discount to book value gives some margin of safety, but value traps live in exactly this place: cheap, quiet, and slowly bleeding. I want to see sales return and cash burn stop before I commit capital. If assets can be liquidated prudently, this could be an asset play; if not, book value will erode toward the share price. I would not buy today, but I would keep it on the watchlist for evidence of a genuine business rebirth.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer