Career Point Edu (CPEDU)

Slow Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹204.84
Market Cap₹372.66 Cr
P/E Ratio16.23
ROCE48.34%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield2.44%
Profit Growth12.9%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth6.42%
Promoter Holding63.7%
52-Week Range₹141 — ₹338.75
SectorOther Consumer Services

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let's look at Career Point Edu. The first thing I notice is the return on capital employed: 48.34%. That is an excellent number and tells me this education business generates strong earnings without requiring too much capital. That is the kind of asset quality Graham would admire. Promoters hold 63.70%, so their interests are aligned with minority shareholders. But I must separate a nice business from a nice investment. Sales growth is only 8.29%, and profit growth is negative at -10.96%. That means the company is earning less on more revenue. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹15 Cr and net profit of ₹5 Cr, an impressive margin, but one quarter does not reverse a declining trend. The Piotroski F-score of 4 out of 9 worries me; it points to weak financial fundamentals. At ₹189, the market cap is ₹368 Cr and the P/E is 17.35. For a business whose profits are falling, I want a bigger margin of safety. The PEG ratio of 2.09 says I am paying a high price for growth that isn't visible in reported earnings. The stock is down from its 52-week high of ₹338.75 to ₹189, so it may look tempting, but value traps often wear a similar disguise. I cannot calculate book value, return on equity, or debt-equity because those numbers are missing. Graham always demanded a clear picture of the balance sheet before acting. The dividend yield of 1.24% is modest. I need to see improving profits, a better F-score, and a lower price before this becomes an intelligent investment. It may be a decent business, but at this valuation it is not a compelling one for a value investor.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer