Cords Cable (CORDSCABLE)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹218.51
Market Cap₹282.48 Cr
P/E Ratio13.75
ROCE16.21%
ROE9.65%
Dividend Yield0.55%
Profit Growth102.4%
Debt/Equity0.55
Sales Growth9.5%
Promoter Holding52.35%
52-Week Range₹127.01 — ₹395.05
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹155.66

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹175.85, I'm being asked to pay 13.18 times earnings and 1.33 times book for Cords Cable. That is not an expensive price, but price alone is not enough in Graham's world. The business must earn its valuation. Sales grew 14.71%, yet profits grew only 5.13%. That gap is the first thing I notice. The latest quarter makes it even clearer: ₹236 crore of sales produced just ₹5 crore of net profit—roughly a 2% margin. A business can live with thin margins only if it has enormous turnover and pricing stability; here, profit growth lagging sales suggests the opposite: cost pressure or competition eroding every incremental rupee. The balance sheet is manageable. Debt-to-equity of 0.58 is not alarming, and a Piotroski score of 7/9 indicates the company is not severely stressed. ROCE at 16.21% is respectable, but ROE of 9.65% is moderate. As a minority shareholder, I don't get much cash: the dividend yield is just 0.58%. Promoter holding of 52.35% is a decent sign, but it doesn't create a moat. Valuation looks reasonable on the surface. A P/E of 13.18 and P/B of 1.33 leave some margin of safety if the earnings hold. But the stated PEG of 1.33 implies profit growth will improve beyond the trailing 5.13%. I cannot rely on that without evidence. The wide 52-week range—₹127.01 to ₹259.40—tells me this is not a steady compounder; it behaves like a cyclical. For a capital-intensive, low-margin cable business, I would wait for proof that margins are recovering before treating this as a buy. A watchlist, not a conviction position.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer