C K K Retail (CKKRETAIL)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹127.4 |
| Market Cap | ₹414.18 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 25.69 |
| ROCE | 62.91% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 72.12% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹112.2 — ₹203.2 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
Strengths
- High promoter holding of 72.12% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
- Reported ROCE of 62.91% suggests strong historical capital efficiency, if accurate.
- Current price of ₹127.40 is about 37% below the 52-week high of ₹203.20, leaving room for mean reversion if operations revive.
- Stated P/E of 25.69 implies trailing earnings of roughly ₹16.1 crore at the current market cap, so there is some historical earnings base.
Concerns
- Latest quarter shows zero sales and zero net profit, indicating no visible current operating activity.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 points to weak financial health and higher distress risk.
- No dividend yield means minority shareholders receive no income while waiting for recovery.
- Missing book value, ROE, and debt/equity data make a Graham-style margin-of-safety analysis impossible.
AI Analysis
At ₹127.40, C K K Retail is valued at ₹414 crore. I start with one question: how much cash does this business generate? The latest quarter answers with zero sales and zero net profit. That is not a business in operation; it is a business in suspension. The stated P/E of 25.69 looks odd when the bottom line has disappeared, and profit growth and sales growth of 0.00% give me no reason to expect improvement. A reported ROCE of 62.91% would normally excite me, but without current revenue it is an unverified remnant of better times. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 reinforces my skepticism: this is a weak balance sheet and operations score. There is no dividend yield, so I am not being paid to wait. The promoter owns 72.12% of the company, which is good alignment, but high ownership is not the same as a moat. The price has already fallen from ₹203.20 to ₹127.40, but a falling stock is not a margin of safety; in fact, it can be a value trap. Graham taught me to buy with a margin of safety measured by tangible assets and actual earning power. Here, book value, ROE, and debt/equity are unavailable, so I cannot even estimate liquidation protection. Sugar is a cyclical industry, and this may be a cyclical trough or an operational collapse. Without audited quarterly data, cash flow, and a clear plan from management, I cannot invest. This is a possible turnaround or shell, not a stalwart. I would put it in the 'too hard' pile until it shows at least a few quarters of positive sales and profit.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer