Cinevista (CINEVISTA)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹14.72 |
| Market Cap | ₹84.55 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 13.89 |
| ROCE | -19.91% |
| ROE | 11.39% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 256.44% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.27 |
| Sales Growth | -36.4% |
| Promoter Holding | 67.43% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹12.16 — ₹22.8 |
| Sector | Entertainment |
| Book Value | ₹9.86 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding at 67.43% aligns interests with minority shareholders
- Debt/equity of 0.44 is manageable
- Price-to-book of 1.22 is close to book value
- Latest quarter turned net positive: ₹8 Cr sales and ₹4 Cr profit
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some fundamental improvement
Concerns
- Negative ROE of -24.71% and ROCE of -19.91% indicate ongoing value destruction
- P/E of 0.00 means no meaningful earnings multiple can be applied
- Sales growth of 27,400% is off a very low base; absolute quarterly sales are only ₹8 Cr
- Zero dividend yield and a thin margin of safety at 1.22 times book
AI Analysis
At ₹17.30, Cinevista is a small-cap media company with an ₹89 Cr market cap. Graham would tell us not to fall in love with a P/E of 0.00; it means there is no consistent earnings stream to value. Book value is ₹14.14, so the market is paying about 1.22 times book. That is not a screaming bargain, especially when the company earns a negative return on equity of -24.71% and a negative ROCE of -19.91%. A business that earns less than a risk-free fixed deposit on its equity is destroying value, not compounding it. What interests me is the latest quarter: sales of ₹8 Cr and net profit of ₹4 Cr. That is a 50% net margin at the quarterly level, but from a tiny base. The reported sales growth of 27,400% and profit growth of 256% are statistical illusions because prior numbers were near zero. I cannot project a wonderful future from a single quarter in a capital-intensive entertainment business. On the balance sheet, debt-to-equity is 0.44, which is manageable, and promoter holding is high at 67.43%, aligned with minority investors. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 is moderate, not a red flag, but not a proof of turnaround. I would classify this as a turnaround candidate, not a stalwart. The current valuation is not cheap enough for an asset play because returns are negative. I would need several more quarters of positive earnings, improving ROE, and evidence that the latest profit is not an accounting one-off or a non-recurring item. Until then, this remains a show waiting for reviews. The margin of safety is thin.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer