Cell Point (CELLPOINT)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹34.1 |
| Market Cap | ₹63.72 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 33.14 |
| ROCE | 4.77% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -13.64% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 15.26% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹11.7 — ₹34.1 |
| Sector | Retailing |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Cell Point strikes me as a business that must be judged on margins, not sales. Retail is intensely competitive, and I see no clear moat from cost advantage, brand loyalty, or pricing power. The latest quarter shows ₹177 Cr of sales but ₹0 Cr of net profit. On a market cap of just ₹28 Cr, even a small profit recovery would matter, but at 33.14 times trailing earnings while profit fell 13.64%, the market is already paying for a turnaround. ROCE of 4.77% is far below what I would accept; I could get similar returns without the operational stress of speciality retail. The 15.26% sales growth is encouraging, but growth without profit does not create value. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 reinforces the picture of a financially fragile business. There is no dividend, so minority shareholders receive no return while waiting. With book value, debt-to-equity, promoter holding, and ROE not disclosed, I cannot judge balance-sheet risk or insider alignment. This fails my margin-of-safety test. A ₹28 Cr market cap leaves room for a small absolute turnaround, but I need evidence: consistent quarterly profit, improving ROCE, and clearer financial disclosures. Until then, this is a possible turnaround, not an investment. As Graham taught, price is what you pay; value is what you get. At ₹17.10 with zero latest-quarter earnings, I see little value. I would rather miss a speculative recovery than risk permanent capital in a business without a demonstrable moat.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer