Country Club Hos (CCHHL)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹12.23 |
| Market Cap | ₹199.92 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 26.98 |
| ROCE | 2.75% |
| ROE | 0.57% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 99.75% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.08 |
| Sales Growth | -37.62% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.8% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹10.03 — ₹19.5 |
| Sector | Leisure Services |
| Book Value | ₹18.24 |
Strengths
- Trading at a price-to-book of 0.65, well below book value of ₹22.76
- Very low debt/equity of 0.07, indicating a conservative balance sheet
- Promoter holding of 73.80% aligns ownership with minority investors
- Sales growth of 38.93% shows business activity is not stagnant
Concerns
- Latest quarter posted a net loss of ₹1 Cr despite sales of ₹16 Cr
- ROE of 0.57% and ROCE of 2.75% are far below acceptable returns on assets
- Profit growth fell 16.96% while sales grew sharply, indicating margin deterioration
- Piotroski F-score of 4/9 and no dividend offer little comfort to value investors
AI Analysis
At ₹14.79, Country Club Hos is being offered at a 35% discount to its book value of ₹22.76. As Graham would say, buying a rupee for sixty-five paise is a good start, but only if that rupee can someday earn a fair return. Right now it isn't. ROE is just 0.57%, and ROCE is 2.75%. A business with this much asset backing and so little earning power is a parked asset, not a compounding machine. The latest quarter sums it up: sales of ₹16 Cr and a net loss of ₹1 Cr. I find it hard to pay 26.98 times earnings when earnings fell 16.96% over the year, even though revenue rose nearly 39%. That kind of divergence tells me pricing power or cost control is missing. On the positive side, debt/equity is only 0.07, so the balance sheet isn't a worry. Promoters own 73.80%, which aligns interests, but high ownership is a double-edged sword if they don't unlock value for minority holders. There's no dividend, so patient shareholders get no compensation while waiting. The Piotroski score of 4/9 reinforces my caution; fundamentals are weak. This looks like a classic asset play, not a quality compounder. If the company can monetize its properties or improve operating efficiency, the gap between ₹14.79 and ₹22.76 could narrow. But I need evidence, not hope. I'd rather miss a trade than lose capital. Let the numbers prove sustained profitability before I commit.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer