Capacit'e Infra. (CAPACITE)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 44/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹214.53
Market Cap₹1,815.01 Cr
P/E Ratio9.84
ROCE18.01%
ROE11.22%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-15.1%
Debt/Equity0.25
Sales Growth6.7%
Promoter Holding31.69%
52-Week Range₹180 — ₹334
SectorConstruction
Book Value₹225.62

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance this looks like the kind of company Graham would call a 'cigar butt'—a construction firm with modest valuation, but I must ask whether it is a great business at a fair price or a mediocre business at a cheap price. Capacit'e earns a ROCE of 18.01%, which is respectable, but ROE is only 11.22%. That spread tells me the equity return is ordinary and low leverage, at 0.23 debt/equity, is doing the balance-sheet work. That comfort is real. However, construction has never been an easy industry in which to build a moat. It is cyclical, competitive, and subject to margin pressure. Reported sales grew 14.38%, yet profits declined 3.84%. That divergence worries me far more than the apparent low valuation. The P/E of 10.41 and P/B of 1.33 look reasonable, and the PEG of 0.72 seductive—but a PEG is only useful when earnings are moving in the right direction. Here profits are not. A cheap stock can stay cheap when earnings quality is poor. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 reinforces that caution. It suggests weakening fundamentals beneath the surface. At ₹253.60, the market cap is ₹2,055 Cr. The latest quarter delivered ₹675 Cr revenue and ₹50 Cr net profit, so current earnings support the price. Book value is ₹191.16, offering downside cushion. Yet with no dividend and promoter holding of 31.69%, I see limited owner commitment and no passive return while I wait. I would rather wait for stronger evidence of margin recovery and a better Piotroski score. This is not a quality compounder I can buy blindly; it is a cyclical asset where patience, not optimism, is needed.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer