California Soft. (CALSOFT)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹24.6 |
| Market Cap | ₹19.41 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 10.38 |
| ROCE | 4.41% |
| ROE | 11.08% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 2,161.1% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.04 |
| Sales Growth | 328.8% |
| Promoter Holding | 62.26% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹10.9 — ₹44.8 |
| Sector | IT - Software |
| Book Value | ₹6.68 |
Strengths
- Virtually debt-free with Debt/Equity of 0.02.
- Very high promoter holding of 62.26% aligns ownership with minority shareholders.
- Exceptional recent momentum: sales up 93.89% and profit up 405%.
- Latest quarter revenue of ₹3 crore and net profit of ₹1 crore shows strong recent activity.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests improving operational fundamentals.
Concerns
- ROCE of only 4.41% indicates weak return on capital employed for a software company.
- P/B of 4.76 is expensive relative to book value of ₹2.57.
- Microcap with ₹19 crore market cap and low floating stock can be volatile and illiquid.
- Growth rates are from a tiny base and unlikely to be sustainable; no dividend provides no downside cushion.
AI Analysis
At ₹12.24, California Soft is a microcap with a ₹19 crore market cap. I won't pretend this is the kind of business I can analyze with confidence. The numbers show a company growing rapidly: sales up 93.89%, profit up 405%, and the latest quarter contributed ₹3 crore in sales and ₹1 crore in net profit. That sounds wonderful, but I have learned to be skeptical of percentage growth from a tiny base. A ₹3 crore quarter is a rounding error in the software world, and one good quarter does not make a durable franchise. The balance sheet is clean — debt/equity of only 0.02 — and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 suggests decent recent fundamentals. But the returns are mediocre: ROE is 11.08% and ROCE is just 4.41%. That low ROCE bothers me. A business with a real moat should earn meaningfully more on capital than this. A P/B of 4.76 also means I am paying a heavy premium for ₹2.57 of book value. The P/E of 11.22 looks reasonable only if the recent profit growth continues, and the PEG of 0.04 is absurd — it simply reflects a 405% jump that cannot repeat. Promoter holding of 62.26% is comforting, but it also means very little floats, so price moves can be exaggerated. There is no dividend to reward me while I wait. I might call this a fast grower, but honestly it is a very small, unproven enterprise. Graham would demand a margin of safety; at ₹12.24, with modest returns and a high book multiple, I do not see it. Let the math prove itself over several quarters before I commit. I would rather miss an opportunity than overpay for hope.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer