Blu.Coast Hotel. (BLUECOAST)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹24.49 |
| Market Cap | ₹48.2 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -62.61% |
| ROE | 12.83% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 71.37% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹18.57 — ₹71.47 |
| Sector | Leisure Services |
| Book Value | ₹-15.77 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 71.37% provides some alignment of interest with minority shareholders.
- Reported profit growth of 72.26% may suggest losses are narrowing, although the base is negligible.
- Piotroski F-score of 5/9 indicates some fundamental improvements in certain metrics.
- Tiny market cap of ₹37 crore leaves room for a high-risk operational revival if a turnaround occurs.
Concerns
- Negative book value of ₹-15.08 per share means liabilities exceed assets, leaving no equity cushion.
- Latest quarter sales are ₹0 crore and net profit is ₹-0 crore, indicating no meaningful operating revenue.
- ROCE of -62.61% reflects severe value destruction on capital employed.
- No dividend, meaningless P/E of 0.00, and a sharp 52-week fall from ₹86.31 to ₹29.50 indicate distress and speculation.
AI Analysis
As a value investor, I look for businesses with understandable operations, a durable moat, and a strong balance sheet. Blu.Coast Hotel fails all three tests. The market cap is tiny at ₹37 crore and the price is ₹29.50, but the book value is negative at ₹-15.08 per share, meaning liabilities exceed assets. P/E is 0.00 because there are no meaningful earnings; the latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 crore and net profit of ₹-0 crore. ROCE is deeply negative at -62.61%, signalling that capital employed is being destroyed, not compounded. The 72.26% profit growth sounds impressive, but from a loss-making, zero-revenue base it is an accounting illusion. ROE of 12.83% is an arithmetic distortion caused by negative equity, not a sign of business quality. There is no dividend yield, so I receive no income while waiting. The 52-week range of ₹18.57 to ₹86.31 reveals a speculative and volatile stock, not a stable enterprise. Promoter holding of 71.37% is high, but in such a small, financially weak company, it can also mean poor minority protection and low liquidity. The Piotroski F-score of 5/9 is mediocre at best. Graham would demand a margin of safety; this balance sheet offers none. This could only be a possible turnaround if management can start producing real sales, improve cash flows, and repair the negative net worth. Until then, the rational investor must stay away. A low price is not the same as value. I do not speculate on stories without numbers. I will wait for visible evidence of sustainable revival before considering Blu.Coast.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer