BirlaNu Ltd (BIRLANU)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹1,555.2 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,172.76 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -2.58% |
| ROE | 2.77% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% |
| Profit Growth | -49.46% |
| Debt/Equity | 1 |
| Sales Growth | 11.6% |
| Promoter Holding | 40.57% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1,190.1 — ₹2,012.4 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹1,472.48 |
Strengths
- Trades below book value at P/B of 0.84, offering a balance-sheet cushion against a price of ₹1,436.30 and book value of ₹1,710.58.
- Sales grew 6.53%, showing the business still has some revenue momentum despite profit troubles.
- Promoter holding of 40.57% aligns management with minority shareholders to a reasonable extent.
- Dividend yield of 1.99% provides modest income while waiting for a turnaround.
Concerns
- Latest quarter reported a net loss of ₹53 Cr, and profit growth has collapsed by 49.46%, making the P/E meaningless.
- ROCE of -2.58% indicates operations are not earning an adequate return on invested capital.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and a FairStock Score of 0/100 signal poor financial health and high risk.
- Debt/equity of 0.88 combined with negative profitability raises solvency and interest-coverage concerns.
AI Analysis
When I look at BirlaNu, the first thing I notice is that the market is offering me this business at ₹1,436.30 per share while the book value stands at ₹1,710.58. That is a 0.84 price-to-book ratio, or roughly a 16% discount to stated net assets. Graham taught me to look for margin of safety, and on the balance sheet there is some cushion. But I must be honest: a cheap price is not enough if the business itself is bleeding. The latest quarter shows a net loss of ₹53 Cr, and profit growth has fallen by 49.46%. The P/E is meaningless here because earnings have turned negative. Return on equity is a mere 2.77%, and ROCE is deeply negative at -2.58%, meaning the company is destroying value at the operating level. This is not a quality compounder; it is a possible asset play, but with real operational red flags. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.88 is manageable but not comfortable when profits are negative and the Piotroski F-Score is only 3 out of 9. That score tells me the financial health has been deteriorating. I do see some positives: sales are still growing modestly at 6.53%, the dividend yield is 1.99%, and promoters hold 40.57%, so their interests are somewhat aligned. But furniture and home furnishing is a competitive, low-moat business. Unless management can stop the losses, improve capital allocation, and show credible operating margins, this remains a risky bargain. I would watch the next few quarters very closely before treating it as a true value investment.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer