Bedmutha Indus. (BEDMUTHA)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹113.63 |
| Market Cap | ₹366.61 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 56.53 |
| ROCE | 16.67% |
| ROE | 4.38% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 307.72% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.37 |
| Sales Growth | 74.91% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹-10,55,053.76 Cr |
| Promoter Holding | 57.05% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹94.55 — ₹150.01 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹47.09 |
Strengths
- Sales grew 30.44%, showing top-line momentum
- ROCE of 16.67% implies decent operating capital efficiency
- Promoter holding of 57.05% aligns management with shareholders
- Priced within 52-week range, not at a distressed low
Concerns
- Net loss of ₹4 crore in latest quarter and negative ROE of -4.25%
- Debt-to-equity of 1.52 increases financial risk in a cyclical industry
- Free cash flow deeply negative, suggesting earnings quality is poor
- P/B of 2.66 for a loss-making firm offers no margin of safety
AI Analysis
When I look at Bedmutha, I see a business fighting a difficult battle in a capital-intensive, cyclical industry. Iron and steel products have never been a breeding ground for durable moats; price takers, commodity inputs, and heavy fixed costs dominate. The numbers confirm my unease. Despite a 30% jump in sales, the latest quarter shows a net loss of ₹4 crore, and profit growth of -284% signals the erosion isn't an accident. Return on equity is negative at -4.25%, so shareholders' book value is being burned. Book value per share is ₹43.99, yet the market pays ₹116.90—a P/B of 2.66. For a money-losing steel company, that's optimism I can't stomach. Debt-to-equity of 1.52 amplifies the risk: in a downturn, fixed obligations become a noose. Free cash flow is deeply negative, meaning the reported sales growth may be bought with borrowing, not generated by operations. The Piotroski F-score of 4 out of 9 tells me financial health is weak, and with zero dividend, I get no income while waiting for a turnaround. To be fair, ROCE of 16.67% suggests some operating discipline, and promoter holding of 57% aligns owners with minority shareholders. But in Graham's terms, this is not an investment; it's speculation on a cyclical recovery. I'd need a margin of safety—a price well below book value, a cleaner balance sheet, and proof of consistent profitability. Until then, I'll watch from the sidelines.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer