Baweja Studios L (BAWEJA)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹83.75 |
| Market Cap | ₹154.33 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.36 |
| ROCE | 11.19% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -50% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 10.29% |
| Promoter Holding | 70.69% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹21.1 — ₹83.75 |
| Sector | Entertainment |
Strengths
- Low P/E of 8.36 offers an optically cheap valuation
- Promoter holding at 70.69% aligns management with minority shareholders
- Sales growth of 10.29% shows some top-line momentum
- ROCE of 11.19% indicates reasonable capital efficiency
Concerns
- Profit growth is down 50%, and latest-quarter net margin is thin at roughly 5.7%
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals weak financial health
- No dividend and zero yield, so returns depend purely on price appreciation
- Missing book value, ROE, and debt/equity data limits margin-of-safety analysis
AI Analysis
Baweja Studios is exactly the kind of business I would approach with caution. Film production, distribution and exhibition is not a predictable franchise; it is a project-driven, hit-driven industry where today's blockbuster does not guarantee tomorrow's release. At ₹37, market cap ₹57 Cr and P/E 8.36, the stock looks inexpensive. But profit growth is down 50%. A lower P/E with falling earnings is not automatically a bargain. The latest quarter's sales of ₹35 Cr and net profit of ₹2 Cr translates to a thin margin, so earnings power is weak. ROCE of 11.19% is acceptable but not the kind of return on capital that makes a business exceptional. I cannot compute book value or ROE because the data is unavailable; Graham would demand these figures before trusting a margin of safety. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 is a red flag, indicating deteriorating financial health. Without debt/equity data, I must be conservative. Promoter holding at 70.69% is good; owners have skin in the game. But a zero dividend yield means shareholders rely entirely on capital appreciation, which is speculative in this sector. Sales growth of 10.29% is positive, but it is not enough to offset the profit collapse. The PEG ratio of 0.81 looks attractive, but when current earnings are falling, historical growth assumptions can mislead. I would classify this as a cyclical, and a cyclical only deserves investment if the balance sheet is rock solid and the price is deeply below intrinsic value. Here, I lack the data to prove that. I will wait for more evidence.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer