Solve Plastic (BALCO)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹22.05 |
| Market Cap | ₹7.49 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -24.67% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 121.54% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 8.72% |
| Promoter Holding | 63.35% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹13.4 — ₹26 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 63.35% aligns management with minority shareholders.
- Sales growth of 8.72% shows modest expansion in the business.
- Latest quarter sales of ₹22 Cr are far higher than the ₹7 Cr market cap, a potentially attractive price-to-sales signal if margins recover.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some fundamental signals are improving despite weak profitability.
Concerns
- ROCE is -24.67%, indicating operations are currently destroying capital.
- Latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr; P/E of 0.00 means there is no meaningful earnings stream to validate valuation.
- Critical data such as book value, debt/equity and ROE are unavailable, preventing a Graham-style margin-of-safety analysis.
- A market cap of just ₹7 Cr creates liquidity and volatility risks, and the 121.54% profit growth is misleading from a near-zero base.
AI Analysis
I am wary of businesses I cannot measure, and Solve Plastic leaves me with too many blanks. The market quotes a price of ₹22.05, capitalizing the company at just ₹7 Cr. Yet the latest quarter alone shows sales of ₹22 Cr. That looks intriguing on the surface, but Graham taught me that a cheap price must be tested against assets and earnings. Here, book value, debt/equity and ROE are all N/A, and P/E is 0.00 because net profit is essentially ₹0 Cr. Without those numbers, I cannot calculate a margin of safety. Sales grew 8.72%—respectable but not compelling for a micro-cap in a competitive plastic products industry. The reported 121.54% profit growth is meaningless from a base of zero; you cannot compound nothing. ROCE of -24.67% is a red flag: the company is destroying capital, not earning its keep. Piotroski F-score of 6/9 hints that some financial signals are improving, and promoter holding of 63.35% means owners have skin in the game. That is helpful, but high promoter control in a ₹7 Cr company also brings governance and liquidity worries. Is this a turnaround? Possibly, but a turnaround requires visible evidence: a quarter or two of real net profit, positive returns on capital, and a clean balance sheet. Until then, this is a speculative small-cap, not an investment. In Buffett's terms, it fails my 'unable to classify' test because I need reliable numbers to judge quality. I would rather miss an opportunity than be forced to rely on hope. I will keep it on the watchlist and wait for better disclosures.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer