AWL Agri Busine. (AWL)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 74/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹192.16
Market Cap₹24,823.57 Cr
P/E Ratio21.49
ROCE20.89%
ROE9.98%
Dividend Yield0.52%
Profit Growth47.3%
Debt/Equity0.11
Sales Growth17.5%
Free Cash Flow₹1,872 Cr
Promoter Holding56.94%
52-Week Range₹171.19 — ₹282.9
SectorAgricultural Food & other Products
Book Value₹80.73

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

I start by asking whether the business has durable economics. AWL sells edible oil, a daily necessity, but the latest quarter makes the model clear: ₹18,603 Cr of revenue produced only ₹269 Cr of net profit. That is a net margin below 1.5%. No amount of scale can fully protect you when the raw material is a global commodity and you are largely a price-taker. Revenue has compounded at 11.4% over five years, and latest sales grew 21.85%, yet profit fell 21.09%. That divergence is exactly what worries me: growth is buying turnover, not earnings power. The balance sheet is decent: debt/equity of 0.11, Altman Z-Score of 4.56, Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, and free cash flow of ₹1,872 Cr. Promoters own 56.94%, so there is skin in the game. ROCE of 20.89% is respectable, but the equity return is lower at 9.98%, suggesting the franchise cannot command a high margin on capital. Now valuation. I refuse to pay 25.63 times earnings for a business whose earnings are falling. Graham's Number, ₹108.61, is far below the current price of ₹197.30, and the DCF intrinsic value of ₹25.28 is even lower. There is no margin of safety. The zero dividend compounds the problem: I get no cash while I wait. This is not a terrible company; it is a cyclical, low-margin, financially solid business. But at this price, I am being asked to pay for growth that is not showing up in profits. I would wait for either margins to recover or the share price to provide a Graham-style margin of safety.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer