AVT Natural Prod (AVTNPL)
Slow GrowerFairStock Score: 44/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹81.25 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,237.31 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 19.07 |
| ROCE | 12.84% |
| ROE | 9.85% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% |
| Profit Growth | 155% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.2 |
| Sales Growth | 82.2% |
| Promoter Holding | 75% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹53.5 — ₹96.79 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹36.73 |
Strengths
- Low leverage with debt/equity of 0.19 provides balance sheet cushion
- High promoter holding of 75% aligns interests with minority shareholders
- Sales growth of 12.23% shows demand momentum in the business
- ROCE of 12.84% is above ROE, indicating reasonable operating efficiency
- Trading below 52-week high of ₹82.50, giving a lower entry point than recent history
Concerns
- Net profit declined 19.58% despite sales growth, pointing to margin pressure or inefficient conversion
- Piotroski F-score of 4/9 suggests deteriorating financial health
- P/B of 2.16 to book value ₹31.10 offers limited margin of safety
- ROE of 9.85% is modest, and FairStock score is 34/100 (risky)
AI Analysis
At ₹67.33, AVT Natural Products has a market cap of ₹984 Crore. Graham would start with the balance sheet, and there is something to like: debt-to-equity is only 0.19, and promoters hold 75%, so the owners are very much invested. But I cannot stop there. The return on equity is 9.85% and ROCE is 12.84%—acceptable, not outstanding. Sales grew 12.23%, yet net profit fell 19.58%. That divergence bothers me. A business should convert higher sales into higher owner earnings; when it doesn't, either margins are under pressure or management is spending to grow at the expense of profit. The latest quarter, with ₹194 Cr sales and ₹17 Cr profit, shows a net margin of roughly 8.8%, but the trailing decline in earnings clouds the picture. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 is a red flag; it suggests financial health is deteriorating, not improving. At ₹67.33, the P/E is 17.23 and P/B is 2.16 against a book value of ₹31.10. That is not deep value. Graham would insist on a margin of safety, but at 2.16 times book and a PEG of 1.41, I am paying for growth that has not appeared in the profit line. The dividend yield is only 1.08%, and the share sits well below its 52-week high of ₹82.50 but well above its low of ₹53.50. The market has already noticed the problems. This is a conservatively financed, moderately performing agricultural-products business with no clear moat. It may deserve its place in a portfolio one day, but with falling profits and a fair-stock score of 34/100, I would wait for either a meaningfully lower price or clear proof that profitability has turned around.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer