Alivus Life (ALIVUS)
StalwartFairStock Score: 48/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹1,386.7 |
| Market Cap | ₹17,024.72 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 28.25 |
| ROCE | 24.92% |
| ROE | 21.42% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% |
| Profit Growth | 31.71% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.02 |
| Sales Growth | 8.51% |
| Promoter Holding | 74.91% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹819 — ₹1,493.8 |
| Sector | Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology |
| Book Value | ₹271.02 |
Strengths
- Outstanding capital efficiency: ROE of 21.42% and ROCE of 24.92%
- Near-zero debt (D/E 0.02) provides financial stability and downside protection
- Strong promoter holding of 74.91% aligns management with minority shareholders
- Healthy Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates solid fundamentals
- Profit growth of 23.35% significantly outpacing sales growth, showing operational leverage
Concerns
- Very low revenue growth of 4.84% – profit growth may not be sustainable without top-line expansion
- Rich valuation: P/B of 5.11 and PEG of 1.41, leaving little margin of safety
- Low dividend yield of 0.55%, so total return depends entirely on price appreciation
- FairStock Score of 44/100 suggests a mixed outlook, with potential overvaluation or weak growth signals
AI Analysis
When I look at Alivus Life, I see a business with many of the qualities I admire, but at a price that demands caution. The company earns a return on equity of 21.42% and a return on capital of 24.92% – numbers that would make any capital allocator take notice. Debt-to-equity is a mere 0.02, so this is a fortress balance sheet. Promoters hold 74.91%, aligning their interests with mine as a minority shareholder. The Piotroski score of 7/9 also confirms a healthy financial position. Yet, I must ask: what is the growth engine? Sales grew only 4.84%, while profits jumped 23.35%. That tells me the recent earnings surge is margin-driven, not volume-driven. Such expansion can be sustainable for a time, but it is not the same as top-line momentum. The P/E of 19.90 is reasonable for a high-ROE pharma, but the P/B of 5.11 means I am paying a steep premium to book value. The dividend yield is just 0.55%, so I am not being paid to wait. With a PEG of 1.41, the growth is not particularly cheap. This feels like a well-run, nimble pharma stalwart – a quality compounder with a wide moat, but one that needs to show me stronger revenue traction or a more attractive entry price before I would commit fresh capital. I would watch the next few quarters to see if profit growth can be sustained alongside sales recovery. For now, I'd rather be patient and wait for a margin of safety.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer