Ahlada Engineers (AHLADA)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹38.36 |
| Market Cap | ₹49.56 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 274 |
| ROCE | 6.03% |
| ROE | 0.13% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.89% |
| Profit Growth | -69.72% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.28 |
| Sales Growth | -11.98% |
| Promoter Holding | 49.3% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹31.22 — ₹72 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹106.07 |
Strengths
- Trades at a steep discount to book value: P/B 0.45, with book value ₹106.59 against price ₹47.68
- Low debt-to-equity of 0.27 provides financial cushion
- Promoter holding at 49.30% aligns owner-operator interests
- Offers a 3.54% dividend yield despite weak earnings, indicating some cash flow resilience
Concerns
- Sales down 74.15% and profits down 92.67%—a severe business contraction
- Latest quarter net profit is zero, and ROE is not measurable, suggesting poor profitability
- Piotroski F-score of 3/9 points to weak fundamental health and high distress risk
- ROCE of only 6.03% is unattractive relative to the asset base
AI Analysis
When I look at Ahlada Engineers, I see a classic Graham-style bargain hunting situation, but also a warning light. The stock trades at ₹47.68 against a book value of ₹106.59—a P/B of just 0.45. That means I can buy ₹100 of net assets for ₹45. That is the kind of margin of safety that catches any value investor's attention. But Benjamin Graham also told us to look at earnings power. Here, the picture is grim. Sales have collapsed by 74.15% and profits by 92.67%. The latest quarter shows net profit of zero on ₹24 Cr of sales. ROCE stands at 6.03%, which is barely acceptable, and ROE is not even reportable—likely negative. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 confirms a financially stressed firm. Debt is low at 0.27, which gives some cushion. The dividend yield of 3.54% is tempting, but with no current earnings, that payout is coming from reserves or borrowed strength—not sustainable in my view. Is this a cigar butt? Possibly. A promoter holding of 49.30% aligns incentives, but a 74% sales drop signals deeper issues—maybe a loss of a major customer, or a structural demand problem. I cannot call this a quality business; there is no moat here. It is an asset play at best. I would want to see clear evidence of sales stabilization, an order book revival, or meaningful asset monetization before putting money in. If the business continues to burn value, that cheap book value can evaporate. I'll watch from the sidelines unless numbers turn.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer