Agni Green (AGNI)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹51.8 |
| Market Cap | ₹101.19 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 50.09 |
| ROCE | 6.94% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 53.33% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 5.26% |
| Promoter Holding | 70.57% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹13.15 — ₹51.8 |
| Sector | Construction |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me start with what I understand. Agni Green is a civil construction business, an industry where I struggle to find an enduring moat. The numbers here tell me this is a micro-cap operation with a market cap of just ₹35 Cr and latest quarter sales of ₹17 Cr. At ₹21.40, I am being asked to pay a P/E of 50.09. That is rich for any business, but especially for one whose sales grew only 5.26% and whose latest quarter net profit is essentially ₹0 Cr. The reported 53.33% profit growth sounds nice, but percentages from a tiny base can mislead; a zero-profit quarter reminds me how fragile that earnings stream is. ROCE is just 6.94%, barely above what a bank fixed deposit may offer, and with debt/equity and book value not available, I cannot fully assess the balance sheet risk. Promoter holding is high at 70.57%, which can mean better alignment, but it also leaves minority shareholders little influence. The Piotroski score of 7/9 is the one genuinely encouraging signal, but it does not compensate for a lack of competitive strength. Ben Graham taught me to demand a margin of safety. Here I see none: no meaningful sales growth, no dividend, no clear moat, and a valuation that leaves no room for error. Construction is cyclical and prone to payment delays and margin pressure. I would rather wait until Agni Green proves it can generate consistent profits and better returns on capital. For now, this is a pass.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer