Archidply Decor (ADL)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹69.54 |
| Market Cap | ₹38.71 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 962 |
| ROCE | 3.21% |
| ROE | 0.04% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 100% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.37 |
| Sales Growth | 3.7% |
| Promoter Holding | 72.69% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹50.26 — ₹95.4 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹103.22 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹77.94, Archidply Decor sells below its book value of ₹89.62, a P/B of 0.87. That sounds like a Graham-style margin of safety, but I have to ask: is the book value actually earning anything? No. ROE is 0.04%, ROCE is just 3.21%, and the latest quarter shows net profit of ₹0 Cr on sales of ₹11 Cr. This is not a wonderful business. Sales are down 12.33%, and the P/E of 962 only tells you earnings are almost nonexistent. The 100% profit growth is meaningless off an incredibly small base, and the PEG of 9.62 confirms the market is not giving you growth at a reasonable price. Debt/equity at 0.37 is manageable, but with a 0.00% dividend yield, you are getting no cash while you wait. Promoter holding at 72.69% is high, which is good on alignment, but the small float and tiny ₹38 Cr market cap make this more of a neglected small-cap asset situation. The Piotroski score of 6/9 is moderate, but that mostly reflects balance-sheet mechanics, not franchise strength. This is an asset play: you are paying roughly 87 paise for every rupee of book value in a commodity plywood/laminates business with weak pricing power and declining sales. Graham would say a bargain must also have earning power. Here, the earning power is almost zero. I would wait for evidence that the book can generate a decent return before seeing this as a true value opportunity.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer