AAVAS Financiers (AAVAS)
StalwartFairStock Score: 60/100 — STEADY
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹1,397.4 |
| Market Cap | ₹11,079.99 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.21 |
| ROCE | 10.09% |
| ROE | 14.38% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 23.01% |
| Debt/Equity | 3.11 |
| Sales Growth | 12.93% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹-1,483.9 Cr |
| Promoter Holding | 48.95% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1,060.4 — ₹1,771.9 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹637.79 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 48.95% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates sound profitability, funding, and operating efficiency.
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹170 Cr on sales of ₹674 Cr implies a strong net margin of about 25%.
- Consistent growth: sales up 13.39% and profit up 10.30%, with ROE of 14.38%.
- Focused housing finance franchise in a structural-growth segment of the Indian economy.
Concerns
- Graham Number of ₹991.16 versus price of ₹1,411.15 implies a negative margin of safety of 29.71%.
- Debt/Equity of 3.19 is high, though common for a housing finance company; it leaves less room if credit costs rise.
- Free cash flow is negative at ₹-1,484 Cr, meaning growth depends on continuous external funding.
- No dividend yield—total returns must come entirely from future price appreciation.
- Altman Z-score of 1.04 and EV/EBITDA of 633.03 raise red flags, though these ratios are not designed for lenders.
AI Analysis
Let me examine AAVAS the way I'd examine any business: can I understand it, does it have durable economics, and am I paying a sensible price? With a market cap of ₹10,181 Cr, this is a mid-sized housing finance company. Housing finance in India is a business I can understand. AAVAS earns a ROE of 14.38% with a P/B of 2.56; that's not cheap, but not crazy for a lender. Sales grew 13.39% and profit 10.30% last year, so this is a steady compounder, not hyper-growth. The latest quarter showed net profit of ₹170 Cr on sales of ₹674 Cr, a healthy margin. Promoter holding of 48.95% keeps skin in the game, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests balance-sheet discipline. However, Graham's number is ₹991.16, while the market quotes ₹1,411.15. That is a 29.71% negative margin of safety. I won't pay above a conservative estimate of value merely for good quality. Debt/equity of 3.19 is normal for a housing finance company, but it demands constant attention to borrowing costs and asset quality. Free cash flow is negative at ₹-1,484 Cr, which I expect in a growing lender—loan disbursements are investments, not expenses—but it means the company will need continued funding. The Altman Z-score of 1.04 is not designed for regulated finance companies, so I won't overreact, but I will watch capital ratios. Mr. Market has offered a range between ₹1,060 and ₹1,772 over 52 weeks. Today's price is in the lower half, yet still above my conservative intrinsic value. I'd rather wait for a better price, or stronger proof of growth and asset quality, before making this a meaningful position. Quality exists; the margin of safety does not.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer