63 Moons Tech. (63MOONS)

Turnaround

FairStock Score: 4/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹786.25
Market Cap₹3,622.92 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-2.31%
ROE1.27%
Dividend Yield0.15%
Profit Growth4.12%
Debt/Equity0
Sales Growth465.1%
Promoter Holding45.63%
52-Week Range₹467 — ₹966
SectorIT - Software
Book Value₹770.44

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at 63 Moons as an investor first, not as a trader. A software and consulting company that reports ₹27 crore of quarterly sales and a ₹32 crore net loss is, by definition, not earning its keep. The P/E of 0.00 is meaningless; no sensible valuation can be built on zero or negative earnings. So I go to the balance sheet. Book value is ₹626.22, and the market price of ₹694.30 is only 1.11 times book. That offers some cushion, especially because the company has zero debt on its books. Promoters own 45.63%, which is a healthy alignment of interests, and a Piotroski F-score of 6/9 suggests the financial basics are not collapsing. But a low price-to-book is only attractive if the assets can produce earnings. ROCE is -2.31%, meaning invested capital is being destroyed at the operating level, and ROE of 1.27% is too thin to compensate the risk. The 128.01% sales growth looks dramatic, but the base is tiny: quarterly sales of ₹27 crore, and that growth is producing losses, not profits. The 4.12% profit growth figure is a red flag when P/E is shown as zero and the latest quarter is negative. In Graham's language, a stock near book value with no debt is not automatically a bargain; I need earnings power and managerial honesty to turn assets into income. This is a turnaround candidate, and turnarounds are hard. The 52-week range of ₹467 to ₹1,029.90 also shows the market has been speculative. I would wait for at least two or three consecutive profitable quarters, and evidence that ROCE turns decisively positive, before considering a position.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer